Phonons: Understanding k-Vectors & Brillouin Zone

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phonons
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of phonons, specifically focusing on k-vectors and their relationship to the Brillouin zone. Participants are exploring how k-vectors that exceed the first Brillouin zone do not provide additional information compared to those within it.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equivalence of k-vectors in terms of physical states, questioning how the periodicity of the reciprocal lattice affects the information carried by these vectors. There is also exploration of the implications for electromagnetic waves compared to phonons.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing insights about the relationship between wave behavior and dispersion relations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the translation of k-vectors, but multiple interpretations and questions remain, particularly concerning the differences between phonons and electromagnetic waves.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of wave behavior in periodic systems and the implications of reciprocal lattice vectors, with some expressing confusion about the underlying principles that differentiate phonons from other types of waves.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon
Can someone explain how the movie above the caption
k-Vectors exceeding the first Brillouin zone (red) do not carry more information than their counterparts (black) in the first Brillouin zone.
is a justification of the statement in the caption?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
you see that both the red and the black sinosodial curve represent the "same" physical state (the particle going up and down). They carry the same information.

Since k are multipiles of reciprocal lattice vectors, we see that each k of this kind carry the same information as the smallest one, i.e we only need the k that is contained in the 1st BZ. The other ones, we can "translate back" with a multiple of reciprocal lattice vectors.
 
I see. The key is that the two waves travel at different speeds and in different directions as a result of the dispersion relation, right?
 
ehrenfest said:
I see. The key is that the two waves travel at different speeds and in different directions as a result of the dispersion relation, right?

Hmm yes, I think so. You get an infinite set of soultion, but you can always relate them to the smallest one (smallest magnitude), by substracting or adding reciprocal lattice vectors.
 
Why does that same argument not imply that electromagnetic waves with wavevectors outside of some zone do not carry extra information? I guess I am confused about how the periodicity of the reciprocal lattice makes that argument true? If you put more of those black dots in there, would they just go up and down also, or is there something special about the black dots that they chose?
 
every black dot will show the same behavior.

The difference between EM and phonons is perhaps that phonon is not a particle, EM is a photon. And also that the crystal have translation symmetry-
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K