Phonons vs Gauge Bosons: What's the Difference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nuby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bosons Phonons
nuby
Messages
336
Reaction score
0
Whats the difference between phonons and gauge bosons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nuby said:
Whats the difference between phonons and gauge bosons?

In classical field theory the Lagrangian of interest (which basically defines what "theory" I'm talking about) may have a symmetry. For example, it may happen that my Lagrangian doesn't change if I multiply the fields by a phase e^{i\phi}. If I let \phi depend on space and time (this is called "gauging") then the multiplication of the fields by e^{i\phi(x)} no longer leaves the Lagrangian invariant. But, by introducing *more* fields called gauge fields (i.e., by changing the Lagrangian I start with, changing the theory), I can force the Lagrangian to be invariant. When I quantize the gauge fields, the resulting particles are called "gauge bosons".

When I quantize the theory of lattice vibrations, I end of with particles (which are bosons) called "phonons".
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
60
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
108
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top