Photoelectric Effect and Conic section

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a high school student's confusion regarding a claim that the photoelectric effect can be proven using conic sections, specifically hyperbolas. The student expresses a lack of understanding of how these concepts are related. Other participants in the discussion also find the assertion unclear and suggest that the student seek clarification from the professor. There is a consensus that this connection is not commonly recognized or discussed in academic contexts. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for further explanation on the topic.
BrianKim
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi. I'm high school student who is doing a math project.
Yesterday, my project partner (to be precise, his teacher) told me that one can
prove the photoelectric effect with conic section, especially with hyperbola.
(But, actually, I can't even understand the meaning of the statement. For me, those seem unrelated with each other.)

Anyway.

Do you have any idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BrianKim said:
I can't even understand the meaning of the statement.
Yes, even I can't understand this. Perhaps you should revert back to the professor and ask him what he meant? I've never heard of any such "proof".
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top