Photon Detectors: Absorption or Further Testing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter StevieTNZ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Detectors Photon
AI Thread Summary
Photon detectors typically function by absorbing photons, which triggers a cascade effect resulting in measurable current flow, based on the photoelectric effect. The discussion raises the question of whether photon detectors can detect photons without absorption, allowing for further testing. It is noted that the act of detection alters both the detector and the photon, suggesting limitations in traditional detection methods. The concept of "weak measurement" and quantum non-demolition measurement is introduced as potential avenues for detecting photons without destruction. Further exploration of these advanced measurement techniques could provide insights into non-invasive photon detection.
StevieTNZ
Messages
1,934
Reaction score
873
Do photon detectors necessarily need to absorb the photon to detect it (i.e. can photon detectors exist that make the detection but allow us to perform further tests on the photon)?
 
Science news on Phys.org
"photon Detectors" aka Photomultiplier tubes work on the principal of the photon(s) striking an electrode which emits electrons which strike other electrodes emitting more electrons in a cascading effect, producing a measurable current flow, the "photoelectric effect" first discovered by Heinrich Hertz in the late 1800's and was followed up by work done by Elster and Geite.

I personally am unaware of any photon detectors that work the way you describe, maybe some one else will chime in with that possibility :)

cheers
Dave
 
A detector is changed by the photon, and the photon (if it still exists) is changed by the detector. This is a statement that does not depend on the details of the detection mechanism.

You can only step in the same stream once.
 
You might be interested in so-called "weak measurement". I don't know much about it, but you clearly have an internet connection :smile:
 
Might be possible via Quantum Non demolition measurement

Chk this article out
"Quantum non-demolition measurement allows physicists to count photons without destroying them"
http://www.physorg.com/news197873165.html
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top