Photon in time versus photon not so much-ish in time

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sublite
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photon Time
Sublite
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Okay, second question I have to ask, again, hopefully not stupid. First, I've been perusing the forums and see the common question asked again and again, what's it like for a photon "experiencing" reality, and I totally agree or understand the standard answers: the math breaks down, we don't/can't know, the frame is invalid, but an electron moving at .99c would see such and such. The proper time for a photon is null and it travels through no space to arrive at its destination. So it has this null, or completely unextended, aspect. But within spacetime it's an energy/momentum transmitter, and acts as a carrier wave for information. Maybe this is a meaningless question, or perhaps my characterization is inaccurate, but does anybody have a good explanation for how this dual aspect works?

Again, thanks for any help.

C.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a good questin. Part of the thinking about it should be "how long is a photon"? The answer is that it depends on the definiteness of it's energy. Most of us think a photon has a definite specific exact energy h*f. But this is only true for a photon that is extremely long in space. By the uncertainty relation it's possible to emit a photon over a very short period of time so that there is great uncertainty about it's energy. It's a "white photon". This white photon would have a very short spatial extent.

Back to your question, whether a photon has a very narrow energy or whether it is "white", it travels at c and doesn't experience time. To a photon there is no difference between traveling a millimeter or traveling 10 billion light years. You are right about null proper time but it has extent and that extent is embedded within a travel distance. Two circularly polarized photons of 300 MHz are sent into space. One hits the moon and twisted 402 million times. The other is still going and will twist uncounted times before it hits something distant but no proper time elapsed for either. It's difficult to imagine how this looks in the photons frame.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top