Photons are produced at random?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the direction of a photon emitted from a hydrogen atom after excitation is random or correlated with the direction of the incident photon. It is noted that both coherent and incoherent processes can occur, with the typical absorption-re-emission process being incoherent. The role of conservation of momentum is emphasized in understanding the relationship between the incident and emitted photons. A participant raises a question about absorption spectra, suggesting that if an atom emits photons of the same frequency, it should not alter the photon's direction, leading to confusion about measuring absorption lines. The conversation highlights the complexities of photon behavior in atomic interactions and the implications for understanding absorption spectra.
Chaos' lil bro Order
Messages
682
Reaction score
2
Consider a hydrogen atom. A photon strikes it at some random angle. The hyrogen's electron absorbs the photon. The electron becomes excited and its orbital increases. The electron deexcites and emits a photon.

Question: Is the direction of the emitted photon a random direction. Or is there a correlation with the emitted photon's direction with the original incident photon's direction?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Chaos' lil bro Order said:
Is the direction of the emitted photon a random direction?
You can answer your own question if you consider conservation of momentum. (A photon of energy E has momentum |p| = E/c.)
 
Chaos' lil bro Order said:
Question: Is the direction of the emitted photon a random direction. Or is there a correlation with the emitted photon's direction with the original incident photon's direction?

Both can occur. It if there is a correlation, we talk about a coherent process, if not, we talk about an incoherent process. Usually the "absorption-re-emission" process is incoherent.
 
DrGreg said:
You can answer your own question if you consider conservation of momentum.

That seemed reasonable at first (I can see through water), but then I started thinking about absorption spectra. If I hit a sample with photons of an appropriate energy to excite the atoms, and assume the atom will emit the exact same frequency, then obviously in the atom's rest frame it cannot have altered the photon's direction. But without scattering, I shouldn't be able to measure absorption spectra.

Is this actually a mechanism that prohibits certain absorption lines, or was my assumption wrong?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Back
Top