A Physical interpretation of hopping between orthogonal orbitals

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter hokhani
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electric Field
hokhani
Messages
552
Reaction score
15
TL;DR Summary
What causes hopping between orthogonal orbitals?
Suppose two orthogonal neighbouring orbitals ##|\phi _1 \rangle## and ##|\phi _2 \rangle## so that ##\langle \phi_1|\phi _2 \rangle =0##. Applying an electric field adds a new term ##u (c_1^{\dagger}c_1-c_2^{\dagger}c_2)## to the Hamiltonian which u is a constant potential. Obviously, we still have the hopping as ##\langle \phi_1|u (c_1^{\dagger}c_1-c_2^{\dagger}c_2)|\phi _2 \rangle =0##. I would like to know how the hopping arises between the two neighbouring orbitals.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cross terms including ##c_2^{\dagger}c_1##, etc. seems required.
 
anuttarasammyak said:
Cross terms including ##c_2^{\dagger}c_1##, etc. seems required.
Right, but my question is how this term may arise?
 
A familiat perterbation Hamiltonian in applying electric field is
H'=eEx
where
x=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}(c+c^\dagger)
I do not have enough knowledge of your system ##|\phi_1>,|\phi_2>##.
 
hokhani said:
TL;DR Summary: What causes hopping between orthogonal orbitals?

Suppose two orthogonal neighbouring orbitals ##|\phi _1 \rangle## and ##|\phi _2 \rangle## so that ##\langle \phi_1|\phi _2 \rangle =0##. Applying an electric field adds a new term ##u (c_1^{\dagger}c_1-c_2^{\dagger}c_2)## to the Hamiltonian which u is a constant potential. Obviously, we still have the hopping as ##\langle \phi_1|u (c_1^{\dagger}c_1-c_2^{\dagger}c_2)|\phi _2 \rangle =0##. I would like to know how the hopping arises between the two neighbouring orbitals.
The orbital are assumed to be orthogonal for convenience but in the true Hamiltonian they are not. There is some overlap, it is considered tiny but it is this overlap that allows hopping. Check the tight-binding theory.
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top