Physical interpretation of hopping between orthogonal orbitals

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hokhani
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electric Field
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physical interpretation of hopping between orthogonal orbitals, specifically ##|\phi_1\rangle## and ##|\phi_2\rangle##, where ##\langle \phi_1|\phi_2 \rangle = 0##. The introduction of an electric field modifies the Hamiltonian by adding a term ##u (c_1^{\dagger}c_1 - c_2^{\dagger}c_2)##, but hopping is still zero between these orbitals. The key insight is that while the orbitals are orthogonal, a small overlap in the true Hamiltonian facilitates hopping, as explained by tight-binding theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and orbital theory
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Knowledge of tight-binding theory
  • Basic concepts of electric fields in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the tight-binding model in solid-state physics
  • Explore perturbation theory in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the effects of electric fields on quantum systems
  • Investigate the mathematical formulation of overlap integrals in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum chemists, and students studying quantum mechanics, particularly those interested in orbital interactions and solid-state physics.

hokhani
Messages
580
Reaction score
20
TL;DR
What causes hopping between orthogonal orbitals?
Suppose two orthogonal neighbouring orbitals ##|\phi _1 \rangle## and ##|\phi _2 \rangle## so that ##\langle \phi_1|\phi _2 \rangle =0##. Applying an electric field adds a new term ##u (c_1^{\dagger}c_1-c_2^{\dagger}c_2)## to the Hamiltonian which u is a constant potential. Obviously, we still have the hopping as ##\langle \phi_1|u (c_1^{\dagger}c_1-c_2^{\dagger}c_2)|\phi _2 \rangle =0##. I would like to know how the hopping arises between the two neighbouring orbitals.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cross terms including ##c_2^{\dagger}c_1##, etc. seems required.
 
anuttarasammyak said:
Cross terms including ##c_2^{\dagger}c_1##, etc. seems required.
Right, but my question is how this term may arise?
 
A familiat perterbation Hamiltonian in applying electric field is
H'=eEx
where
x=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}(c+c^\dagger)
I do not have enough knowledge of your system ##|\phi_1>,|\phi_2>##.
 
hokhani said:
TL;DR Summary: What causes hopping between orthogonal orbitals?

Suppose two orthogonal neighbouring orbitals ##|\phi _1 \rangle## and ##|\phi _2 \rangle## so that ##\langle \phi_1|\phi _2 \rangle =0##. Applying an electric field adds a new term ##u (c_1^{\dagger}c_1-c_2^{\dagger}c_2)## to the Hamiltonian which u is a constant potential. Obviously, we still have the hopping as ##\langle \phi_1|u (c_1^{\dagger}c_1-c_2^{\dagger}c_2)|\phi _2 \rangle =0##. I would like to know how the hopping arises between the two neighbouring orbitals.
The orbital are assumed to be orthogonal for convenience but in the true Hamiltonian they are not. There is some overlap, it is considered tiny but it is this overlap that allows hopping. Check the tight-binding theory.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K