I'm trying to recreate some results from a paper:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1711.pdf

Basically they take the Hamiltonian of graphene near the Dirac point (upon irradiation by a time periodic external field) and use Floquet formalism to rewrite it in an extended Hilbert space incorporating time periodic functions; in doing this they effectively remove the time dependence of the periodically modulated Hamiltonian. Skipping a few steps, they rewrite this Floquet Hamiltonian in a subspace of two potentially degenerate eigenvector branches near the Dirac point (eigenvalues of this matrix are equation (15)). The matrix is (for only the m=0 and m=1 modes)

[itex]

H_f =

\left[

\begin{array}{cc}

\hbar\Omega -\hbar v_fk_p& \frac{v_fe}{2c}A_0e^{i\theta}\\

\frac{v_fe}{2c}A_0e^{-i\theta}& \hbar v_f k_p

\end{array}

\right]

[/itex]

The eigenvectors of this matrix are quasienergy states [itex]|\phi^\alpha\rangle[/itex] from the equation [itex]H_F |\phi^\alpha\rangle = \epsilon_\alpha|\phi^\alpha\rangle[/itex]. My problem is from going from equation (9)

[itex] |\phi^\alpha\rangle = (|u^\alpha_1\rangle, |u^\alpha_0\rangle)^T [/itex]to (8) [itex]|\phi^\alpha(t)\rangle = |u^\alpha_0\rangle + |u^\alpha_1\rangle e^{i\Omega t}[/itex] in which the coefficients [itex] |u^\alpha_m\rangle[/itex] are 1x2 kets. Expanding [itex]|\phi^\alpha\rangle [/itex]:

[itex]

|\phi^\alpha\rangle =

\left[

\begin{array}{cc}

u^\alpha_{1a}&u^\alpha_{1b}\\

u^\alpha_{0a}&u^\alpha_{0b}

\end{array}

\right]

[/itex]

I need to apply this to the 2x2 Hamiltonian and solve for the [itex] u^\alpha_m[/itex]coefficients. Then take those coefficients and put them into

[itex]

|\phi^\alpha(t)\rangle =

\left[

\begin{array}{c}

u^\alpha_{0a}\\

u^\alpha_{0b}

\end{array}

\right]+

\left[

\begin{array}{c}

u^\alpha_{1a}\\

u^\alpha_{1b}

\end{array}

\right]e^{i\Omega t}

[/itex]

to get the final answer they have in equation (17). In doing so I get a system of 2 equations and 4 unknowns. When I work this out my answer doesn't come out like theirs. Is this the right way to go about going from the form in the extended Hilbert space

[itex] |\phi^\alpha\rangle = (|u^\alpha_1\rangle, |u^\alpha_0\rangle)^T [/itex]to the form in the standard Hilbert space (8) [itex]|\phi^\alpha(t)\rangle = |u^\alpha_0\rangle + |u^\alpha_1\rangle e^{i\Omega t}[/itex]?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Eigenvectors of a Floquet Hamiltonian

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Eigenvectors Floquet Hamiltonian | Date |
---|---|

A The Hamiltonian of the XY model -- when is it called the XX model? | Mar 2, 2018 |

A Physical meaning of terms in the Qi, Wu, Zhang model | Jan 20, 2018 |

What is a floquet (optical) sideband? | Jan 8, 2016 |

First-variational and second-variational eigenvectors | Mar 12, 2014 |

Phonon eigenvectors rotation | Apr 24, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**