Physical quantities versus wave function?

wasi-uz-zaman
Messages
89
Reaction score
1
hi, please explain can by using suitable operator we can find any physical quantity- as by using hamiltonian on wave function we can find energies by the eigenvalues?
thanks
wasi-uz-zaman
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The classical physical quantity only arises if the state is an eigenstate of the operator.

Just like in linear algebra, multiplying a matrix by one of its eigenvectors has the same effect of multiplying the eigenvector by a constant (the corresponding eigenvalue).

In your example, the time independent Schrodinger equation, the wavefunction is an eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian, or some linear combination of eigenfunctions.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
does it mean operator can only apply to eigenfunction?
 
No, but it's difficult to determine the action of an operator on something that isn't an eigenfunction, so we always try to write wave functions as a superposition of eigenfunctions of an operator to determine its action.
 
Not all physical quantities are eigenvalues of some operator, time being the most immediate example.
When a quantum system is described by a wave function, the time evolution is determined by a unitary operator that acts on the Hilbert space used to describe the particle. If the Hilbert space has dimension "n", then the time evolution operator over a given time interval is an element of U(n). Now, physics enters because we do not necessarily have the capacity to reproduce the effect of an arbitrary element of U(n). A physical interaction will have the effect of causing the system to move within some continuous subgroup S of U(n). An interaction over an infinitesimal interval of time gives rise to an element of the Lie algebra "s" associated with S, which is a vector in the tangent space of the identity of S. By our assumptions, this "s" can be used to build physical Hamiltonian operators, and acts on the Hilbert space in a way that is consistent with the action of S.
The Hilbert space used to describe the wave function decomposes into eigenspaces under the action of 's', and these eigenspaces are 'distinguishable' because they generally have different dynamical properties (consider the differences between singlet and triplet states in a two-electron system: one exhibits entanglement in all reference frames, while the other does not). The actual eigenvalues of 's' can be determined in the finite-dimensional case through verifying certain global symmetries of the system, or through measuring the density of states in an experimental setup where the microcanonical ensemble Hamiltonian is given by 's'.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
61
Views
5K
Back
Top