Courses Which Abstract Algebra Sequence is Best for Aspiring High Energy Physicists?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on choosing between two abstract algebra sequences for a physics major interested in high energy physics. The first sequence focuses on group theory, ring theory, and algebraic field extensions, while the second includes number theory and more advanced topics like permutation groups and modules. The first sequence is an honors course, expected to be more challenging and taught in a smaller setting. Participants emphasize the importance of consulting academic advisors for tailored guidance, while also acknowledging the value of peer insights from current and former physics students. Ultimately, the decision should align with the student's academic goals and comfort level with the material.
Josh0768
Messages
53
Reaction score
6
My university offers two different two-semester sequences for learning abstract algebra, and I can't decide which one would be better for me, a physics major. Here are the two sequences and their course descriptions, copied and pasted from the university website:

Algebra 1: Theory of groups, Sylow theory, the structure of finite Abelian groups, ring theory, ideals, homomorphisms, and polynomial rings.
Algebra 2: Algebraic field extensions, Galois theory. Classification of finite fields. Fundamental Theorem of Algebra.
OR
Abstract Algebra I and Number Theory: Structure of the integers, congruences, rings, ring homomorphisms, ideals, quotient rings. A writing course with an emphasis on proofs.
Abstract Algebra II: Permutation groups, groups of transformations, normal subgroups, homomorphism theorems, modules. Principal ideal rings, unique factorization domains, noncommutative rings, rings of fractions, ideals.

Which one of these sequences would be the most beneficial for me (a physics major with aspirations to enter high energy physics) to take?

(It might be worth noting that the first sequence is an honors sequence, and as such, I would expect it to be taught in a smaller setting and I think it would be the harder of the two sequences.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have started several threads on "Physics and XXX". Given that the potential range of XXX is enormous, what did your advisor say when you asked him or her? And why do you think our advice is any better?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
You have started several threads on "Physics and XXX". Given that the potential range of XXX is enormous, what did your advisor say when you asked him or her? And why do you think our advice is any better?
I thought it would be most appropriate not to pepper my advisor with daily emails and questions before I’ve even met him in person. I also figured that a website full of ex and current physics majors would be able to help me with questions that pertain to majoring in physics.
 
  • Like
Likes member 587159
Josh0768 said:
not to pepper my advisor with daily emails and questions

That's very considerate.

You're working yourself into a tizzy for nothing. You don't have your entire life planned out before you've finished high school.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
501
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top