Physics of Verne Gun: Launching Vehicle to Escape Velocity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter qraal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gun Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of using a nuclear pulse to launch a vehicle to escape velocity, as proposed by Brian Wang. The vehicle would utilize hydrogen as a working fluid to facilitate energy transfer from the nuclear detonation to the payload. The design suggests a 2 km long acceleration track in a vacuum, with a final velocity target of approximately 13,500 m/s. Key challenges include determining the necessary gas temperature of around 4600 K and understanding the dynamics of gas expansion and dissociation during the process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear pulse propulsion concepts
  • Knowledge of thermodynamics, particularly gas expansion and energy transfer
  • Familiarity with the properties of hydrogen gas at varying temperatures
  • Basic principles of high-acceleration physics and its implications for payload design
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of nuclear pulse propulsion systems
  • Study the thermodynamic properties of hydrogen at high temperatures
  • Explore the dynamics of gas expansion in vacuum environments
  • Investigate the effects of high acceleration on payload materials and design
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physicists, and researchers interested in advanced propulsion systems and high-velocity launch mechanisms.

qraal
Messages
789
Reaction score
4
A scenario recently sketched out by Brian Wang at "Next Big Feature" is to launch a vehicle to escape velocity via using a nuclear pulse, but enclosed so the fall-out can be contained. I suggested it needed a working fluid, specifically hydrogen, to provide a mechanical coupling between vehicle and nuclear detonation. The original "Orion" nuclear pulse design used multiple small explosions over a long acceleration track up through the atmosphere - thus fallout issues. Brian supposed a large nuke might instead allow a very high acceleration of a payload in a short distance. Obviously it wouldn't be a manned vehicle, since the acceleration would be 10,000-100,000 gees. One problem I saw was the issue of energy transfer, since the original "Orion" used small charges that focussed the plasma from the blast, but interacted very briefly with the ultra-hot plasma, else the pusher plate would be in serious trouble.

So what if a nuke was used to heat a volume of hydrogen gas, which was then allowed to expand and push the payload along a tube, say 2 km long. Basically an updated Verne Moon-Gun. I assumed the vehicle massed 10,000 tons, had a circular base (10 or 20 metres wide), was totally filled by either payload or a light, strong volume filling material. Boosted along a 2 km track, in a vacuum, until the end when a high-speed shutter would open. Final velocity would be roughly 13,500 m/s, allowing for some frictional loss.

I could only make rough guesses as to what gas temperature would be required and I've no idea how efficiently a nuclear detonation's x-ray and neutron flash would transfer heat to the hydrogen, but I assumed a spherical gas reservoir either 100 to 200 metres across, probably under some positive pressure, buried in a mountain. For diatomic hydrogen initially at 300 K I ended up with a temperature of about 4600 K, in order for the expanding gas to do sufficient work to push the payload to the right speed. However I have no idea just how fast the gas would really expand - supersonic? sonic speeds? And how much would dissociate and ionise? How do you work that out? I know the specific energies for each, but not the actual proportions that would obtain.

Any pointers, physics heads?
 
Science news on Phys.org
qraal said:
Obviously it wouldn't be a manned vehicle, since the acceleration would be 10,000-100,000 gees.

Well, not after the engines started, that's for sure!
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Well, not after the engines started, that's for sure!

Well put. Any thoughts on the rest of the details?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K