Physics or Physics with Astrophysics?

AI Thread Summary
Choosing between an Astrophysics module or another physics module in a physics degree can impact future opportunities. Opting for the Astrophysics module leads to a degree title of Physics with Astrophysics, which may be beneficial for those interested in pursuing postgraduate research in astrophysics. This specialization can enhance a CV, particularly for roles in research or academia. However, for careers in middle management or broader physics fields, the distinction may be less significant. Ultimately, selecting the module that aligns with personal interests is advised, as it can lead to better academic performance and satisfaction.
IceCrystal
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In a physics degree there is the option of choosing an astronomy module, which I would choose, and having done this it means in the final year there is the option of choosing an astrophysics module or alternatively another physics module. Either of which would be of interest to me.

If I choose the Astrophysics module, my final degree title will be
Physics with Astrophysics.

If instead I choose another physics module my degree will be Physics.

After graduation, would there be any benefit in one degree title over the other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
After graduation, would there be any benefit in one degree title over the other?
Depends strongly on what you want to do after graduation ... eg. if your college has an Astrophysics research program post-grad that you want to join, then do the Astro version. It's probably what it is there for. At my College there was a similar thing for Quantum Optics.

If you expect to go into middle-management then it is six of one and a half-dozen of the other: on the one hand it makes your CV stand out against the plain-science majors, but on the other it may make you look too "head in the stars" for employers ... the gripping hand is: there is no telling - do what you enjoy the best - that way lies better grades.
 
Thank you for that Simon.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
806
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
974
Back
Top