Physics Problems: Calculating Height and Speed in Real-Life Situations

  • Thread starter Thread starter lmf22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Stuck
AI Thread Summary
To solve the first physics problem, the height of the cliff can be calculated using the total time of 2.5 seconds, subtracting the time it takes for sound to travel back up, which is determined by the speed of sound at 340 m/s. For the second problem, the first stone's fall time is denoted as t, while the second stone's fall time is t - 2.3 seconds, allowing for the formation of equations based on their simultaneous landing. The height of the building can be derived from the equations of motion for both stones, and their final speeds can be calculated using kinematic formulas. Understanding the relationship between the time of fall and the height will facilitate solving these problems. Clear equations and a systematic approach will lead to the correct answers for both scenarios.
lmf22
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I am stuck on these 2 physics problems. Can anyone help?

1) A rock is dropped from a sea cliff and the sound of it striking the ocean is heard 2.5 s later. If the speed of sound is 340 m/s, how high is the cliff?

2) A first stone is dropped from the roof of a building. 2.30 s after that, a second stone is thrown straight down with an initial speed of 35.0 m/s, and it is observed that the two stones land at the same time.
(a) How long did it take the first stone to reach the ground?
(b) How high is the building?
(c) What are the speeds of the two stones just before they hit the ground?

Any help on how to get started would be great. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you think of an expression to find the time while the stone is falling down? Now can you think of one for the time while the sound is traveling back up to the top of the cliff?
 
2) Do note that the time the first stone takes to fall down is t while with the second stone it's t-2.3s. This should make forming the equation easier.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top