Physics Q: Travel Faster than Light? E=MC^2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Universe_Man
  • Start date Start date
Universe_Man
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
This may sound mind numbingly stupid to those who are seasoned in Physics, but how do we know that it is impossible to travel faster than light? Have there been tests or experiments? and also, what does the speed of light have to do with the amount of energy in a given amount of mass (E=MC^2)?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Particle accelerators test it every day. If f=ma held at high-speed, they'd be accelerating particles to much faster than the speed of light.
 
is it just because of the infinite energy requirement from 1/((1-(v/c)^2))^.5)?
 
Actually, it is possible to travel faster than light.

Cerenkov radiation is the blue glow in reactor pools that can be likened to a "sonic boom" caused by neutrons traveling faster than light in water.

http://www.physics.upenn.edu/balloon/cerenkov_radiation.html

Or did you mean faster than c?

You need Inflation Theory then!

http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/home/John_Gribbin/cosmo.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Farsight said:
Or did you mean faster than c?

You need Inflation Theory then!

Even now, there are parts of the universe receding from one another at rates faster than c, but this is not quite the same as traveling at faster than c. The overall expansion of space is not restricted in the same way as objects traveling through it. Unless one believes in tachyons, it's not possible to travel faster than the speed of light within the bounds of mainstream theory.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top