Physics Taking Too Long? 3-4 Hours on Kinematics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jacobalg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
Spending 3-4 hours studying the first two sections on kinematics is not inherently bad, as long as the time is used effectively. Understanding the material thoroughly is more important than speed. Key strategies for effective studying include breaking down concepts like position, velocity, and acceleration into simpler forms, utilizing lectures, videos, and example problems, and practicing problems from scratch to reinforce understanding. The time taken can vary significantly among students, and there is no standard duration for mastering the material. If the focus remains on comprehension and effective study methods, the time invested is justified.
Jacobalg
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I just spent about 3-4 hours on studying the first two sections on kinematics i read the section and practice the work book problems i am wondering is that bad?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What matters is that you understand the material thoroughly. It's not a race.
 
Hi Jacobalg,

It would only be "bad" if you're not spending that time wisely.

From what I've found, the best use of your time in physics is:

(1) Deconstructing concepts (e.g. position, velocity, acceleration) into a simple form that you can personally understand. I recommend doing this by going to lecture, watching youtube videos, or working backwards on example problems, and spending as little time reading the book as you feel comfortable.

(2) Doing practice problems from scratch. This builds your understanding of what concepts to use to solve problems, what equations to use, etc. and prepares you to repeat that same process on exams.

If you're spending your 3-4 hours on those two things, I think it's time well spent. Physics does require you to put in the hours, but not in the way most students think.
 
Jacobalg said:
I just spent about 3-4 hours on studying the first two sections on kinematics i read the section and practice the work book problems i am wondering is that bad?

Doesn't sound like a trip to the fun fair :) Life's hard!
 
If it an introductory book, the first few sections on kinematics should take to long (unless you're reading a very tough book) but if the problems are difficult, it really isn't too much time. As tjmller88 said, if you're using your time wisely, it isn't too much. Everyone takes different amounts of time to understand something and there is no "ideal" time that it should take.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top