Picking a Tent: Prism-Shaped Choice of 2.4m or 250cm

  • Thread starter Thread starter Faxali
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Choice
AI Thread Summary
When choosing between two prism-shaped tents for summer camping, key factors include dimensions and volume. Tent 1 measures 2.4 m long, 2.2 m wide, and 1.2 m tall, while Tent 2 is 2.5 m long, 2.1 m wide, and 1.15 m tall. Calculating the volume involves determining the area of the triangular face and multiplying by the length, requiring consistent unit conversion. The discussion emphasizes the importance of tent size and suitability for the camping experience, particularly in relation to the relationship with the camping partner. Ultimately, the decision hinges on which tent offers more space and comfort for the intended use.
Faxali
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Warning: Template not used; No solution attempt
You and your friend will camp during the summer and going to buy a tent that has the form of
a prism . The store has two different tents that you choose from. Which tent will you buy.

Tent 1: 2.4 m long, 220 cm wide and 12 dm tall.
Tent 2: 250 cm long , 21 dm wide and 1.15 m high
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Faxali said:
You and your friend will camp during the summer and going to buy a tent that has the form of
a prism . The store has two different tents that you choose from. Which tent will you buy.

Tent 1: 2.4 m long, 220 cm wide and 12 dm tall.
Tent 2: 250 cm long , 21 dm wide and 1.15 m high

What is the figure of merit? I.e. is this a casual friend or a "close" friend to whom you would like to become closer? Is weight a factor? What are we minimizing or maximizing?
 
  • Like
Likes AlephNumbers
I need to know which one I should buy. Which one is bigger.
 
Faxali said:
I need to know which one I should buy. Which one is bigger.

These are all triangular prisms, I assume. The volume would be the area of the triangular face (0.5 * base * height) times the length. Convert everything to the same units (i.e. meters) and you will be comparing volumes in identical units i.e. cubic meters.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top