Piercings and tattoos in the physics community

  • Thread starter Thread starter seaofghosts
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the impact of visible piercings and tattoos on employment opportunities within the physics community. Participants share personal experiences and opinions regarding how appearance may influence hiring decisions, particularly in conservative industries, as well as the social perceptions associated with body modifications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express the belief that visible piercings and tattoos may not significantly affect job prospects, especially if the individual appears non-threatening.
  • Others argue that first impressions, influenced by appearance, can play a crucial role in hiring decisions, particularly in conservative fields.
  • There are differing views on whether tattoos related to science or mathematics might be viewed more favorably.
  • Some participants share personal anecdotes about their experiences with piercings and how they were perceived in professional settings.
  • Concerns are raised about the appropriateness of visible body modifications during job interviews versus after securing a position.
  • A few participants express strong negative opinions about tattoos, considering them unattractive and unnecessary, while others defend the validity of personal choices regarding body art.
  • There is a humorous exchange regarding the specifics of one participant's piercing experience, highlighting the informal nature of some contributions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the impact of piercings and tattoos on employment. Multiple competing views remain, with some advocating for a more conventional appearance while others support personal expression through body modifications.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the influence of industry norms and personal biases on perceptions of appearance, indicating that these factors may vary widely across different workplaces.

seaofghosts
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

Anyone here (visibly) pierced and/or tattooed? Did it affect your chances of finding work? What about REUs or internships?

My gut feeling is that it's probably not that big of a deal for most. I come from a front-end banking background where dress code is everything, and then moved to the IT department where hardly anyone cared. I'm curious if I would be looked down upon walking into work with a nose ring and sleeve.

And on a lighter note, does it count TOWARD you if your tattoos are science/math related? :-p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think it matters very much. If you look like you just got off a Harley after breaking a pool cue on some guy's head, that might count against you... who wants an intimidating coworker? But if you look harmless enough, just inked and pierced, I don't think you'll have any problem at all.

I have to ask about your tattoos now though... you have "BORN TO PROVE" on your arm or something?
 
No tats or piercing, here. I'm unconventional enough on my own, and don't need to join that crowd to prove that I'm an individual.

Playing guitar all weekend in Uni and then later in life gave me all the individuality that I needed.

@OP: I would try to stay conventional. You may have a fantastic chance to hook up with a great prof, and it would be shame to have it blown because (s)he was turned off by your appearance.
 
Good rule of thumb for tattoos and piercings: Get them where you can cover them up!
 
seaofghosts said:
I'm curious if I would be looked down upon walking into work with a nose ring and sleeve.

And on a lighter note, does it count TOWARD you if your tattoos are science/math related? :-p

A nose ring is too close to the eyes, uncommon and makes me uncomfortable, specifically my nose.

Look down on? no way. But other people, sure some would, some wouldn't, some may be favorably biased towards you because of it.


I'm a smoker. That's worse. :smile:
 
I had a pierced ear (left) during university. I removed the stud for a while, and the hole closed up. I work in a pretty conservative industry - the higher up, the more conservative. I've thought about getting it re-pierced, but then I've haven't really bothered.

For a long time, I kept my hair short, but now it's long. I did get some grief about my beard when it got long, but now, it's generally accepted along with my ponytail. My grad school colleagues told me that I wouldn't get a job with my beard. I interviewed for one job and got an offer the next day. I didn't shave. Some of my colleagues were shocked.

I know guys in the industry who have piercings, and some have unusual hair - as in colored mohawks, but that's unusual.

My brother thinks my long hair and beard is a professional hindrance. I don't think so, nor do I care.
 
Last edited:
I had a piercing... twice. It wasn't visible to the general public. Unfortunately, my immune system is so obnoxious that both of them grew out and fell into my shoe. I reluctantly elected to abandon the effort.
I know that it isn't relevant to the original question, but I figured that I'd put it out there.
 
Danger said:
I had a piercing... twice. It wasn't visible to the general public. Unfortunately, my immune system is so obnoxious that both of them grew out and fell into my shoe. I reluctantly elected to abandon the effort.
I know that it isn't relevant to the original question, but I figured that I'd put it out there.

I'm afraid to ask...but where was the piercing given that they fell out "into my shoe"??
 
Drakkith said:
I'm afraid to ask...but where was the piercing given that they fell out "into my shoe"??

I was afraid someone was going to ask.

I could happily go to my grave with a big fuzzy grey patch in place of the answer to this question.
 
  • #10
Drakkith said:
where was the piercing given that they fell out "into my shoe"??

Hmmm... about 1 1/4" above my... uh... favourite appendage. :shy:
It was a 5/8" horizontal staple with 1/4" beads, and a 3" chain hanging from the left side with another 1/4" bead on the end.

DaveC426913 said:
I could happily go to my grave with a big fuzzy grey patch in place of the answer to this question.

:smile:
 
  • #11
Got my left ear pierced about 10 years ago. Have pretty much forgotten it's there.
 
  • #12
I've had nightmares about having a tattoo. I think they're ugly and pointless. I don't care what people's excuse is for getting a tattoo, it's never a good excuse. People get tattoos of their loved ones to remember them by... as if they'd forget about them if they didn't have the tattoo. They must not have been too loved if you need a constant reminder.
 
  • #13
leroyjenkens said:
I've had nightmares about having a tattoo. I think they're ugly and pointless. I don't care what people's excuse is for getting a tattoo, it's never a good excuse. People get tattoos of their loved ones to remember them by... as if they'd forget about them if they didn't have the tattoo. They must not have been too loved if you need a constant reminder.

That's nice. Have you considered that peoples reasons for getting tattoos might be just as valid as yours are for not getting them?
 
  • #14
Danger said:
Hmmm... about 1 1/4" above my... uh... favourite appendage. :shy:
1 1/4"? And I thought you were dangerous. :devil:
 
  • #15
dlgoff said:
1 1/4"? And I thought you were dangerous. :devil:

Above, you pest! I said above.
 
  • #16
I don't know, I don't think you're going to get an answer to your question. Personally I would question your motives if you walked into my office like that, and immediately my opinion of you would be low.

You'd have to really impress me, if I was in a position of offering you a job or research, looking like that.
 
  • #17
What dipole said...
 
  • #18
dipole said:
Personally I would question your motives if you walked into my office like that, and immediately my opinion of you would be low.
It's a tricky thing, this judging on first impressions.

In my office, it's ability to do the job that is scrutinized. So "first impressions" takes a back seat to the "show me the money".

But there are places where the image you send out is an aspect of the job. And in those kinds of jobs, someone who sends the wrong message is also someone who doesn't understand the requirements of their job.
 
  • #19
DaveC426913 said:
It's a tricky thing, this judging on first impressions.
But we do do it, at least in job interviews. I've sat on the interviewer side of the table for my last three employers. Every single one has had "first impressions" as one of the evaluation form items. Dress and appearance can play a part of that first impression, particularly if it's inappropriate.

The general rule is business formal / formal side of business casual when you interview for a job that requires a bachelors degree or higher in a technical field. Leave your rings at home, cover your tattoos. Don't dress like a slob or worse. You can try wearing that stuff to work once you land the job. Some employers won't care, others will ask you to go home and change.
 
  • #20
I was thinking more along the lines of how it would be viewed once you have the job (probably didn't make that very clear, re-reading my post). I wouldn't walk into an interview in a sleeveless shirt to show anything off.

Thanks for the replies, everyone. :)
 
  • #21
I know of a physics teacher who had a couple of tattoos, but they were in areas that could be easily covered if they were to wear a dress shirt. (tied all the way up)

Danger said:
Above, you pest! I said above.

It's funny that you think he was referring to what's not above... :-) :-) :-)
 
  • #22
was just at a big corporate sponsored conference, and it was funny since it seemed to be that a pony tail on the men was required to become a VP.

That said I have a tattoo on my forearm and when I am meeting customers/ collaborators for the first time I generally keep it covered, till they know me. that said, if you are going to totally bias me based on a few tats, I would just write you off. I lived in fear of getting tats and piercings for years, but have just come to the conclusion that you need to be comfortable in yourself. it may hold me back at some point from some super high exec job, but really I do not want that anyway.
 
  • #23
josh_einsle said:
I lived in fear of getting tats and piercings for years, but have just come to the conclusion that you need to be comfortable in yourself. it may hold me back at some point from some super high exec job, but really I do not want that anyway.

That's how I'm beginning to feel as well. My success should and will be based on performance, not on my tattoos. Good to hear that, generally, it won't be an uphill battle when I start working in physics.
 
  • #24
Oh well, there's Flo on my left and there's Mary on my right
And Janie is the girl with that I'll be with tonight
And when she asks me, which one I love the best?
I tear open my shirt I got Rosie on my chest.

Actually, I don't have any tattoos or piercings at all. Just surgery scars. My daughter is an apprentice tattoo artist though. She's pierced and tattood out the wazoo. Well, not really out the wazoo, but darn near.
 
  • #25
D H said:
But we do do it, at least in job interviews. I've sat on the interviewer side of the table for my last three employers. Every single one has had "first impressions" as one of the evaluation form items. Dress and appearance can play a part of that first impression,
Perhaps, but I see a hidden bias in there that piercings and tattoos are inherently bad, lumped in the same category as slobbishness.

There are virtually no circumstances in which slobbishness is a neutral or positive sign of a person. That is not true of tattoos or piercings. They are only bad if the job calls for an appearance that is on the side of conservative.
 
  • #26
DaveC426913 said:
Perhaps, but I see a hidden bias in there that piercings and tattoos are inherently bad, lumped in the same category as slobbishness.

There are virtually no circumstances in which slobbishness is a neutral or positive sign of a person. That is not true of tattoos or piercings. They are only bad if the job calls for an appearance that is on the side of conservative.

I agree.

And the requirements on appearance are always changing. I look at twenty-somethings these days and see maybe 50% have tattoos and/or piercings. That means in ten years, there's a good chance the interviewer will have tattoos and/or piercings. In that case, an interviewee's ink and/or posts might help to make a good impression.
 
  • #27
There's a professor in our dept that recently got tenure that has ear piercings. He's a great researcher.

I don't know whether it would subconsciously affect your odds of getting hired, but most physics professionals would make a conscious attempt to ignore it. There will be some added pressure to show you're a smart, proven physicist. BUT, if you can manage to do that, you'll come out on top looking even cooler (that is, not only smart but presumed independent, interesting, and sociable). Of course, you don't need a tattoo to be fun and interesting. BUT, if you CAN'T show you're as good as any of the others, you might fit into a stereotype that you're not the "physics type". Also, i agree with lisab, tattoos and piercings are common among mid-20s people (though I don't have one .. thinking about it.)

P.S. Don't advise getting physics tattoo (no equations!). Get something more artsy.
 
  • #28
lisab said:
I agree.

And the requirements on appearance are always changing. I look at twenty-somethings these days and see maybe 50% have tattoos and/or piercings. That means in ten years, there's a good chance the interviewer will have tattoos and/or piercings. In that case, an interviewee's ink and/or posts might help to make a good impression.

And then eventually those of us who don't have tattoos will be the ones having a hard time finding a job...
 
  • #29
I have a tattoo, but which is not visible as long as I am fully clothed. I personally do not have anything against tattoos or piercings on individuals, but I can certainly see how it may be judged to be inappropriate in a professional setting, hence I agree with suggestions of getting them where they are easily covered up (if the OP wishes to get them at all).

And to the OP, my tattoo is science/math related! ;) (in fact, the lady at the tattoo shop told me that this was the first time she had ever received a request for a science tattoo! *LOL*)
 
Last edited:
  • #30
I think if you excel in your field, and have a reputation or make a good impression to others that you know what you're doing, then a tattoo is not an important factor.

However, if you are incompetent or people are already skeptical of your abilities, then a tattoo might hurt people's perception of you.

At my old job, the dress code was business casual, and I'm pretty sure exposed tattoos at a job interview there would be a big factor in choosing not to hire. An HR lady even came to my desk after 2 years of being there, and made a comment about my hair starting to get too long and asked why I haven't gotten a hair cut. It wasn't even long enough to put into some kind of pony tail.

I think tattoos aren't that big of a deal at most places, as long as you're respectful to people and are competent.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K