Planar vibrating airfoilcould this idea work?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a proposed concept for a planar vibrating airfoil intended to achieve vertical take-off, hovering, and forward or backward flight. Participants explore the feasibility of this idea from an engineering and aeronautical perspective, referencing principles such as Bernoulli's Principle and the mechanics of lift generation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that an airfoil could generate lift by moving back and forth rapidly, akin to how air is blown across a straw, and questions the feasibility of this approach.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the relative velocity of the wing compared to still air, questioning how fast the oscillatory movement would need to be to achieve necessary lift.
  • A calculation is provided estimating that a frequency of 2,169 Hz would be required to approximate the stall velocity of a single-engine airplane.
  • Some participants argue that the concept resembles a flapping wing vehicle but lacks critical components like pronation and supination, which are essential for effective lift generation in biological systems.
  • There are claims that a wing requires a certain distance of travel to develop a bound vortex necessary for lift, and that the proposed method may not achieve this effectively.
  • Participants discuss the inadequacy of the straw analogy in explaining how airfoils generate lift, emphasizing the importance of pressure gradients and flow dynamics.
  • There are references to bird and insect flight modes that utilize leading edge vortices, suggesting alternative mechanisms for lift that could inform the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of the proposed airfoil concept, with some supporting the exploration of the idea while others challenge its validity based on aerodynamic principles. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the mechanics of lift generation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the proposed analogy and the need for a clearer understanding of the dynamics involved in lift generation, including the role of pressure gradients and vortex formation. There is also mention of the dependence on definitions related to stall and lift mechanics.

  • #31
Regarding the OP's idea: rather than having the wings oscillate back and forth, why not just attach them to a central pivot point and rotate them around in a circle...?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
12K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K