Planar wave solution to zero potential Schrödinger equation

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for a free particle, where the potential V(x) is zero. The wave function is expressed as ##\psi(x, t) = e^{i(kx - \omega t)}##, leading to the relationship between wavenumber k and angular frequency ω. Participants explore the implications of complex coefficients in wave functions and the necessity to check that both ##e^{i(kx - \omega t)}## and ##e^{-i(kx - \omega t)}## satisfy the Schrödinger equation. There is a consensus that the original problem may contain errors, particularly in part (b), regarding the validity of certain wave functions as solutions to the equation. The conversation concludes with a discussion on the need for additional observables to distinguish between degenerate energy eigenstates in quantum mechanics.
  • #61
BvU said:
I don't think it has a "1. Historical introduction
Yup. First chapter is " The wave function" .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Ehm, could you just give a fully valid citation, which is in a format like

S. Weinberg, Lectures on Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press (2013)?
 
  • #63
I have uploaded the entire document for you
 

Attachments

  • #64
Thanks. Well, perhaps you can score some brownie points for yourself by bringing this up carefully ?
Like: "could there be a small glitch in part b" ? I think the ##\Psi_s ## and ##\Psi_c## don't satisfy the SE ?
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K