Planar wave solution to zero potential Schrödinger equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the planar wave solution to the zero potential Schrödinger equation, specifically the wave function represented as ##\psi(x, t) = e^{(ikx - i\omega t)}## with a constant potential ##V(x) = 0##. Participants analyze the implications of this wave function, including its time and spatial derivatives, and the resulting dispersion relation ##\omega(k) = \frac{\hbar}{2m} k^2##. The conversation also touches on the significance of parity in distinguishing eigenstates of the Hamiltonian, emphasizing the need for additional observables to resolve degeneracies in energy eigenvalues.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger equation and its solutions
  • Familiarity with complex exponentials and their applications in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of eigenstates and eigenvalues in quantum systems
  • Basic concepts of wave functions and their properties in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the dispersion relation ##\omega(k) = \frac{\hbar}{2m} k^2##
  • Explore the concept of parity in quantum mechanics and its role in distinguishing eigenstates
  • Investigate the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and its solutions for various potentials
  • Learn about the relationship between momentum eigenstates and parity eigenstates in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists, and researchers interested in wave functions, eigenstate analysis, and the mathematical foundations of quantum theory.

  • #61
BvU said:
I don't think it has a "1. Historical introduction
Yup. First chapter is " The wave function" .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Ehm, could you just give a fully valid citation, which is in a format like

S. Weinberg, Lectures on Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press (2013)?
 
  • #63
I have uploaded the entire document for you
 

Attachments

  • #64
Thanks. Well, perhaps you can score some brownie points for yourself by bringing this up carefully ?
Like: "could there be a small glitch in part b" ? I think the ##\Psi_s ## and ##\Psi_c## don't satisfy the SE ?
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K