Plane wave in Minkowski space-time

Wox
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
The classical expression of a plane electromagnetic wave (electric part)

<br /> \bar{E}(t,\bar{x})=\bar{E}_{0}e^{i(\bar{k}\cdot \bar{x}-\omega t)}<br />

looks a lot like the basis function of the Fourier decomposition in Minkowski space-time

<br /> \bar{E}(\bar{w})=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\hat{\bar{E}}(\bar{\nu})e^{2\pi i\ \eta(\bar{\nu},\bar{w})}d\bar{\nu}<br />

where \bar{E}\colon\mathbb{R}^{4}\to\mathbb{R}^{4} and \bar{w}=(ct,\bar{x}). If I write \bar{\nu}=\frac{\nu}{c}(1,\bar{n}) with \left\|\bar{n}\right\|=1 then we get

\eta(\bar{\nu},\bar{w})=\frac{\nu}{c}\bar{n}\cdot \bar{x}-\nu t=\frac{1}{2\pi}(\bar{k}\cdot \bar{x}-\omega t) and

<br /> \bar{E}(\bar{w})=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\hat{\bar{E}}(\bar{\nu})e^{ i\ (\bar{k}\cdot \bar{x}-\omega t)}d\bar{\nu}<br />

and for a monochromatic wave

<br /> \bar{E}(\bar{w})=\bar{E}(ct,\bar{x})=\hat{\bar{E}}(\bar{\nu})e^{ i\ (\bar{k}\cdot \bar{x}-\omega t)}<br />

which is close to the classical expression, but not exactly. So the point is, I feel Fourier decomposition in Minkowski space and the classical plane wave are related, but I'm not sure how. Can someone clarify?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Vox,

Fourier decomposition in both cases is implemented by taking the inner product of each possible frequency component with each frequency component of the actual wave. That works because all frequency components are mutually orthogonal (when evaluated over a suitably long time interval). But the definition of an inner product is very different in Minkowski space compared with a classical setting (Euclidean geometry).

The definition of the inner product for Minkowski space is described here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_space#The_Minkowski_inner_product
 
Last edited:
I used the proper Minkowskian inner product in \eta(\bar{\nu},\bar{w})=... assuming signature (-+++), while \bar{k}\cdot \bar{x} is the Euclidean inner product.

I don't know what you mean by "in both cases". Consider the Fourier decomposition of any map \bar{E}\colon\mathbb{R}^{4}\to\mathbb{R}^{4} then the basis functions of the Fourier decomposition (frequency components) are \hat{\bar{E}}(\bar{\nu})e^{2\pi i\ \eta(\bar{\nu},\bar{w})}. In the context of electrodynamics, \bar{E} is an electric field and the basis functions look very much like plane waves. My question is: are these plane waves and if yes, how can you show this? (my attempt in the original post didn't work).

When I say "looks like", I mean that \bar{k}\cdot \bar{x}-\omega t is the Minkowskian inner product of (t,\bar{x}) and (\omega,\bar{k}), although I'm not sure what the last four-vectors represents.
 
Last edited:
Sorry. I'm not sure how you would even define a plane in Minkowski space. There seems to be some ideas expressed in mathematical literature but they look a bit esoteric to me.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Back
Top