Plasma Impedance Matching Network

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of developing an algorithm for a plasma impedance L-type matching network. Participants explore the discrepancies in standing wave ratio (SWR) readings when tuning the network for plasma loads compared to non-plasma loads, focusing on the effects of plasma characteristics on impedance and tuning accuracy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the algorithm for tuning may yield different results depending on the path taken to find minimum SWR, suggesting the need to approach from the same starting point or rerun the algorithm.
  • Another participant highlights that plasma can change the impedance of the system, acting as either a capacitor or an inductor, and raises questions about the type of antenna used to generate the plasma.
  • Discussion includes the existence of different plasma modes (E, L, H) that can cause abrupt changes in impedance, particularly when transitioning between modes.
  • Participants inquire about the RF excitation frequency, dimensions of the plasma chamber, and methods of measuring SWR, emphasizing the importance of these factors in understanding the tuning issues.
  • One participant mentions that fluctuations in pressure within the plasma chamber could affect plasma density and, consequently, impedance, leading to variations in SWR readings.
  • Another participant shares their experience with pressure fluctuations in the mTorr range, suggesting that such fluctuations can significantly impact reflected power readings and plasma generation.
  • Concerns are raised about the shielding of the system and potential interference from the RF signal at 13.56 MHz, which could affect the accuracy of the measurements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various hypotheses regarding the causes of the discrepancies in SWR readings, with no consensus reached on the specific factors contributing to the tuning challenges. Multiple competing views on the influence of plasma characteristics, pressure fluctuations, and measurement techniques remain present.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the dependence of the algorithm's effectiveness on the specific conditions of the plasma environment, including pressure stability and the type of antenna used. There are unresolved questions regarding the impact of RF interference and the precise nature of plasma modes on impedance behavior.

Fikadu
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

is there anyone with plasma background?

I am developing an algorithm for a plasma impedance L type matching network.

Initially, I set the Load and Tune units to some specific positions. The algorithm is simply tuning a possible minimum SWR starting from the initial position towards the minimum or maximum position of the units and set back to a position where minimum SWR occurred.

This works for non- plasma loads. But, while testing with plasma, after completing the tuning and setting back to the exact position where minimum SWR happened, it results in largely different SWR and high reflected power reading. I couldn't find out why this happens.

would you help me please?
Thank you a lot
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
It appears the path you take in the minimum SWR search is changing the result. Maybe you must approach from the same starting point or run the algorithm twice.
What is the RF excitation frequency?
What are the approximate dimensions of the plasma chamber?
How do you measure the SWR?
Are there a number of different modes available within the chamber?
Is variation in adjustment changing the mode?
 
Fikadu said:
Dear all,

is there anyone with plasma background?

I am developing an algorithm for a plasma impedance L type matching network.

Initially, I set the Load and Tune units to some specific positions. The algorithm is simply tuning a possible minimum SWR starting from the initial position towards the minimum or maximum position of the units and set back to a position where minimum SWR occurred.

This works for non- plasma loads. But, while testing with plasma, after completing the tuning and setting back to the exact position where minimum SWR happened, it results in largely different SWR and high reflected power reading. I couldn't find out why this happens.

would you help me please?
Thank you a lot
The plasma changes the impedance of your system. It can act as a capacitor or an inductor.

What kind of antenna are you using to generate the plasma? Inductive, capacitive?

Some inductive type antennas have three plasma modes which can exist - E,L,H - depending on the power used and how well the antenna is coupling. Transistioning of these modes cause abrupt changes to the impedance. When entering the H mode from the L mode - reflectance can drop significantly. The http://www.megawavz.com/product.aspx?id=333276 that we have needs to be tuned by hand while the RF source is on. This is for calibration.

At what pressure is the plasma being generated? How well regulated is the vacuum system? If you are operating in the mTorr range, and your pressures are fluctuating, then the plasma density will fluctuate as well, causing the impedance to change, causing the auto tuner to constantly compensate.
 
Baluncore said:
Welcome to PF.
It appears the path you take in the minimum SWR search is changing the result. Maybe you must approach from the same starting point or run the algorithm twice.
What is the RF excitation frequency?
What are the approximate dimensions of the plasma chamber?
How do you measure the SWR?
Are there a number of different modes available within the chamber?
Is variation in adjustment changing the mode?

Dear, Thank you very much for your help.

1. The RF frequency is 13.56MHz.
2. The dimension of the chamber ≈ 50 cm x 60cm x 30 cm( Width x Length x Height )
3. The RF Voltage , Current and phase difference are captured through VI sensor. From these, Forward power, reflected power and then SWR is computed.
4. There is no mode option with in the Chamber.

Thank you once again.
 
Helmholtzerton said:
The plasma changes the impedance of your system. It can act as a capacitor or an inductor.

What kind of antenna are you using to generate the plasma? Inductive, capacitive?

Some inductive type antennas have three plasma modes which can exist - E,L,H - depending on the power used and how well the antenna is coupling. Transistioning of these modes cause abrupt changes to the impedance. When entering the H mode from the L mode - reflectance can drop significantly.The http://www.megawavz.com/product.aspx?id=333276 that we have needs to be tuned by hand while the RF source is on. This is for calibration.

At what pressure is the plasma being generated? How well regulated is the vacuum system? If you are operating in the mTorr range, and your pressures are fluctuating, then the plasma density will fluctuate as well, causing the impedance to change, causing the auto tuner to constantly compensate.

Dear Helmholtzerton,

Thank you very much for your helpful comment.

Depend on power frequency , the Chamber operates as inductive or capacitive. Plasma is being generated at a pressure of 1.3 torr. But some times it fluctuates up and down. might this be a reason?

Thank you a lot
 
Fikadu said:
Dear Helmholtzerton,

Thank you very much for your helpful comment.

Depend on power frequency , the Chamber operates as inductive or capacitive. Plasma is being generated at a pressure of 1.3 torr. But some times it fluctuates up and down. might this be a reason?

Thank you a lot

At around 2 Torr is when I'm able to start to break down air into plasma. - but with that high of a pressure, fluctuations haven't been a problem with a simple hand value to control pressure.

When I am in the mili Torr region, say 10mTorr, it is much easier to see swings in pressure without proper equipment. If the pressure were to fluctuate 5-10%, the reflected reading will jump around as plasma generation is effected by how many neutrals are in the chamber. Pressure is associated with neutrals. Once we opted to use a mass flow controller, these pressure swings were no longer an issue.

I don't see fluctuations being much of a problem at 1.3 Torr. Are you seeing wide pressure swings? By how much?

If your algorithm simply seeks to find the minimum SWR from some information being feed to the device - how well shielded is this system? 13.56MHz could be effecting this signal. Just plug a simple loop antenna into an oscilloscope and hold it up in the room where the plasma is produced. You might be surprised by how much RF you pick up.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Douglas Sunday

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K