Platinium Resistance Thermometer

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of constants for a platinum resistance thermometer used to interpolate temperatures from 0 °C to 692.666 K. The resistance formula R = Ro(1 + A Tc + B Tc2) is applied, with Ro determined to be 7.85630 ohms at the ice point. The user attempts to find constants A and B using algebraic elimination but encounters discrepancies in their results. The consensus is that the approach is valid, and any errors are likely due to arithmetic mistakes in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of resistance temperature relationships
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation and elimination techniques
  • Knowledge of platinum resistance thermometer principles
  • Basic concepts of temperature scales (Celsius and Kelvin)
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the resistance-temperature relationship for platinum thermometers
  • Practice algebraic elimination techniques with real-world data sets
  • Explore the effects of temperature on resistance in materials
  • Investigate calibration methods for resistance thermometers
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and thermodynamics, particularly those involved in temperature measurement and calibration techniques.

peachtree40
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the interval between the freezing point (ice point) of water and 700.0deg-C, a platinum resistance thermometer is to be used for interpolating temperatures from 0 °C to the melting point of zinc, 692.666 K. The temperature, in celsius or Centigrade, is given by a formula for the variation of the resistance of the thermometer with temperature: R = R,o(1 + A Tc + B Tc^2). Ro, A, and B are constants determined by measurements at the ice point, the steam point, and the melting point of zinc. If R equals 7.85630 ohms at the ice point, 65.56082 ohms at the steam point, and 233.60848 ohms at zinc's melting point, find Ro.[/B]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


(0, 7.85630) (100, 65.56080) (692.666-273.15, 233.608)
These are three ordered pairs of data for the equation
I found Ro by just plugging in 0 and finding that Ro is 7.85630
I then plugged in the other ordered pairs and used algebra to eliminate A
65.56082=7.8563+7.8563(100A)+7.8563(10000B)
57.7045=785.63(A+10B)
.07345=A+10B (used for elimination)

233.608=7.8563+7.8563(419.514A)+7.8563(175992B)
225.7417=3295.83(A+419.514B)
.0685= A +419.514B (used for elimination)

after subtracting the two equations to find B and cancel A I find that B= -1.209x10^(-5)
then plugging back into one of the shorter equations above find A to be .0736, but both of these are supposedly wrong...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Approach appears valid.

There is no 'supposedly' about it - you obtained your constants from the experimental points. When you feed these constants and the temperatures back into the equation they must give you back your original experimental points. Anything else must be due to an algebraic or arithmetic mistake.
That is the test, not anything anyone says.

I get constants not wildly different from yours so I think this is basically OK.
They give a visible but not great departure from linearity over the relevant range.

More to add on the science of this if the OP comes back.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K