1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Please, check my proofs

  1. Mar 12, 2013 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Write down careful proofs of the following statements:

    a) sqrt(6)- sqrt(2) > 1

    b) If n is an integer such that n^2 is even, then n is even.

    c) If n= m^3- m for some integer m, then n is a multiple of 6

    3. The attempt at a solution

    I will rely on P - > Q and not Q - > not P to try and prove the above statements.

    a) I think I cant use direct proof (P - > Q) here, because no matter how true Q is, it wont say anything important about P which is the statement sqrt(6)- sqrt(2) > 1. Instead, I will use contradiction.

    Contradiction: not P - > Q(false), not Q - > P

    sqrt(6)- sqrt(2) ≤ 1

    6- sqrt(24) + 2 ≤ 1

    2sqrt(12) ≤ 3 (false statement). Negating this statement makes sqrt(6)- sqrt(2) > 1 true.

    b) n^2 - > n= 2m

    If we assume not P, then n^2 can be assumed to be odd: (1+ 2m)^2= 1+ 4m+ 4m^2= 1+ 4(m+m^2) which is false because we are given that n^2 is even.

    From here it's obvious that n should be even to avoid contradiction.

    c) not P: 1+ 6m = m^3- m where n is not a multiple of 6.

    1+ 6m = m^3- m

    0= m^3- 7m -1 ( I will assume that this result is false because solving for x introduces imaginary numbers which I am not sure if I am allowed to work with).

    Obviously, n is a multiple of 6.

    Correct/Wrong?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 12, 2013 #2

    Mark44

    Staff: Mentor

    You have a mistake above. (√6 - √2)2 = 6 - 2√12 + 2
    2√12 ≠ √24
    It would be helpful if you included all the information.

    n2 is even ##\Rightarrow## n is even
     
  4. Mar 12, 2013 #3
    Mark44, thank You for answering.

    2*√6*√2 = √24? I think I forgot about this rule. Could you, please, tell me what rule that was?


    Can I use n^2 is even - > n = 2m, where m is any integer?

    As for c) not P: 1+ 6m = m^3- m where n is not a multiple of 6.

    To force n to be a non-multiple of 6, we can divide n by 6 such that it yields remainder of 1 or 2. Then n= 1+6m is the non-multiple of 6.
     
  5. Mar 12, 2013 #4
    Oh, I see about 2√12 ≠ √24.

    First I wrote √24, then 2√12. It should be 2√12.
     
  6. Mar 12, 2013 #5

    Mark44

    Staff: Mentor

    Where m is some integer.
    It's much simpler to prove this statement directly.
    Given: n = m3 - m

    Factor the cubic expression and proceed from there.
     
  7. Mar 12, 2013 #6
    Thank You.

    Before I attempt the direct proof I'd like to know if what I wrote in c) passable as a proof, at least, conceptually? I mean is it correct, but ugly or incorrect and ugly? :smile:
     
  8. Mar 12, 2013 #7

    Mark44

    Staff: Mentor

    For c, I don't think what you had is correct.

    P: n= m3- m for some integer m
    Q: n is a multiple of 6

    ~P: ##\forall n##, n ≠ m3- m

    If you're intending to prove the contrapositive, then you need to show that ~Q ##\Rightarrow## ~P

    If you're doing a proof by contradiction, then show that P ^ ~Q leads to a contradiction. I don't see that you did either of those.
     
  9. Mar 14, 2013 #8
    I think what I did above looks a mess. I'd like to redo all that.

    Prove: If n is an integer such that n2 is even, then n is even.

    1. Will this fly:

    Givens: n^2 is even (P)

    Goal: P- > Q

    I want to use the fact that not Q - > not P to get P - > Q

    New Given: not Q

    New Goal: not P

    Suppose that n = 2m + 1 is odd( not Q). Then n^2 = (2m + 1)^2 = 4m^2 + 4m + 1 = 1 + 4(m^2 + m) (not P). Therefore P - > Q and if n is an integer such that n2 is even, then n is even
    .

    ???

    2. If the above is right, how can I better re-wright the bold part?

    3. Is the above a proof by contrapositive or contradiction? What's the difference between the two?

    4. I tried to do this differently, but got stuck:

    Givens: n^2 is even ( P)

    Goal: P - > Q

    How can I modify n^2 directly so that it yields an even n? Also, if I could do that, would that be considered a direct proof?

    Thanks.
     
  10. Mar 14, 2013 #9

    Mark44

    Staff: Mentor

    This is correct, but not well organized. You can omit all of the P and Q stuff, and focus on the statements that are involved.
    I would organize things like this:

    Prove: For an integer n, if n2 is even, then n is even.

    Proof by contrapositive:
    Suppose n is odd.
    Then n = 2m + 1 for some integer m.
    n2 = (2m + 1)2 = 4m2 + 4m + 1 = 2(2m2 + 2m) + 1, which is clearly an even integer.
    ∴ n is an odd integer ##\Rightarrow## n2 is an odd integer.
    Since the contrapositive is equivalent to the original proposition, the original proposition is proved.

    You mean "rewrite the bold part."
    Contrapositive.
    If the original proposition is P ##\Rightarrow## Q, its contrapositive is ~Q ##\Rightarrow## ~P.

    In a proof by contradiction, which is different, you are starting with the assumption that the original proposition is false. If you then arrive at a contradiction, this means that your assumption must have been incorrect, meaning that the original proposition must actually be true.

    In symbols, (P ##\Rightarrow## Q) [itex]\Leftrightarrow[/itex] ~P V Q,
    so ~(P ##\Rightarrow## Q) [itex]\Leftrightarrow[/itex] ~(~P V Q) [itex]\Leftrightarrow[/itex] P ^ ~Q.

    In a proof by contradiction, you assume that the premise (or hypothesis - the "if" part) is true and that the conclusion is false. The goal is always to arrive at a contradiction.
     
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2013
  11. Mar 15, 2013 #10
    You can factor the RHS of n=m^3-m into m(m^2-1), then it is easy proof by exhaustion:
    If m=1 mod 6, then m^2 is also 1 mod 6, so m(m^2-1) is a multiple of 6.
    If m=2 mod 6, then m^2 is 4 mod 6 so m^2-1 is a multiple of 3, and since m is even, then that means that m(m^2-1) is a multiple of 6.
    You can finish up the rest :redface:
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Please, check my proofs
  1. Check my three proofs (Replies: 2)

  2. Check my proof (Replies: 5)

Loading...