claymine
- 12
- 2
- TL;DR
- The result of angular frequency deduced from Eq 1.8 is quite confusing to me. Can some one walk me through it please?
Thank you
The discussion revolves around understanding the application of harmonic oscillator (HO) energy relations in the context of Helium-4 (He4) gas, specifically referencing a text on quantum field theory in statistical physics. Participants are examining the derivation and implications of the frequency relation for harmonic oscillators.
Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are differing interpretations of the author's notation and the application of the harmonic oscillator energy relation.
There are indications of missing assumptions regarding the notation and definitions used in the referenced text, which may affect the clarity of the discussion.
No, I don’t think sodRic2 said:It seems to me the author used the relation ##\omega^2 = \frac k m## for the frequency of an harmonic oscillator, where -in this case- ##k = \phi_p## and ##m = \frac 1 {\rho p^2}##.
cuz in his notation (eq1.8) he has rho bar he forgot the divsion symbol. this is a book called qft in stat phys by A. Abrikosov btw. previously he mentioned in low temp He4 energy is proportional to momentumdRic2 said:Why not ? It looks like the total energy of an HO... BTW I'm sorry but that's the only thing I could think of
thank youdRic2 said:Sorry, I'm not following. If you compare that equation with ##\frac 1 2 m \dot x ^2 + \frac 1 2 k x^2## it is straightforward to obtain ##\omega ^2 = \frac k m##