Please help with Trig question, not a homework.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yungman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework Trig
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the cosine function in electromagnetic theory, specifically the expression cos(πn/2 + πnx/2) for odd integers n (1, 3, 5). The user identifies a discrepancy between their calculations and the book's assertion that cos(πn/2 + πnx/2) equals -sin(πnx/2) without sign changes. The consensus among participants is that the user’s calculations are correct, and they suggest checking the author's or publisher's website for potential errata regarding the book's content.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric identities, specifically the cosine addition formula.
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic theory concepts.
  • Knowledge of odd integer sequences and their properties.
  • Ability to analyze mathematical derivations critically.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the cosine addition formula in trigonometry.
  • Explore common errors in mathematical textbooks and how to identify them.
  • Learn about electromagnetic theory and its mathematical foundations.
  • Investigate the concept of errata in academic publishing.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are dealing with trigonometric functions in electromagnetic theory, as well as educators looking to understand common textbook discrepancies.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
This is part of the derivation in EM theory. I try to simplify and be very specific. I don't agree with the book but this book usually is accurate:

I need to find:

[tex]cos (\frac {n\pi}{2} + \frac {n\pi x}{2}) \;\hbox { where }\; n= 1,3,5...[/tex]

The usual way to solve this is:

[tex]cos (A+B) = cos A cos B - sin A sin B[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow \; cos (\frac {n\pi}{2} + \frac {n\pi x}{2}) = cos (\frac {n\pi}{2}) cos ( \frac {n\pi x}{2}) - sin (\frac {n\pi}{2}) sin ( \frac {n\pi x}{2})[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow \; cos (\frac {n\pi}{2} + \frac {n\pi x}{2}) = - sin (\frac {n\pi}{2}) sin ( \frac {n\pi x}{2}) \;\hbox { because }\; cos (\frac {n\pi}{2}) = 0[/tex]

[tex]sin (\frac {n\pi}{2}) = 1 \hbox { for } \;n=1,\;\;\; sin (\frac {n\pi}{2}) = -1 \;\hbox { for } \; n=3,\;\;\; sin (\frac {n\pi}{2}) = 1 \;\hbox { for }\; n=5.[/tex]

Therefore the answer change sign with different n. But the book gave:

[tex]cos (\frac {n\pi}{2} + \frac {n\pi x}{2}) = -sin (\frac {n\pi x}{2})[/tex]

There is no sign change according to the book. What am I missing? Please help.

Thanks

Alan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't see any errors in your work.

One possibility is to check either the authors website or the publishers website for the errata (basically errors and their fixes). If there is a mistake (and often if there is people send in emails or if its used in a classroom its quickly found out), then that is your best bet in seeing if this error has been called on by someone else.
 
Thanks, that's what I want to hear. This is very obvious to me! But I just never have enough confidence to say it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K