News Plight of Terri Schiavo: Facts, Emotions, and Outcomes

  • Thread starter Thread starter quantumdude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Emotions Facts
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the controversial case of Terri Schiavo, a disabled woman in Florida who has been in a persistent vegetative state for over 12 years following a collapse that caused severe brain damage. The imminent removal of her feeding tube has sparked intense debate about her quality of life, the ethics of allowing her to die by starvation, and the legal responsibilities of her husband versus her parents. Proponents argue that Terri is responsive and could benefit from therapy, while opponents assert that she has been brain dead for years and keeping her alive is a financial burden on taxpayers. The conversation touches on the definitions of persistent vegetative state versus brain death, the implications of medical advancements, and the moral dilemmas surrounding euthanasia and assisted suicide. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the deep emotional and ethical complexities involved in end-of-life decisions, particularly when the wishes of the individual are not clearly documented.
  • #31
Originally posted by Evo:
Grace, apparently you do not know the details of this case. Go read the "Terri Schiavo" thread and get updated.
LMAO, I've been following this case longer than Barbara Simpson and you.

Evo you are too much! :biggrin: :biggrin:

Again, do you know if she feels any pain? Yes or No? If you're not sure, I will find out tomorrow and let you know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Grace said:
Again, do you know if she feels any pain? Yes or No? If you're not sure, I will find out tomorrow and let you know.
From the lower brain stem functions she has, she should feel no pain, so removing the tubes should cause no pain.
 
  • #33
Originally posted by Evo
From the lower brain stem functions she has, she should feel no pain, so removing the tubes should cause no pain.
Terri will begin to suffer the symptoms of starvation within a few hours. Dehydration will kill Terri in a couple of weeks. She will suffer terribly. Terri's death is an exercise in eugenic murder just like the Nazi campaign to kill German citizens with physical and mental handicaps that preceded World War II and the Holocaust. Americans with disabilities are watching this case anxiously to see whether their lives are threatened.

The would be murderer Michael Schiavo has refused one million dollars simply to transfer his rights as Terri Schiavo's guardian to Terri's parents, Bob and Mary Schindler. Bob and Mary and Terri are Catholics. Michael Schiavo, of course, is a Nazi. He is an adulterer, with two bastard children born since Terri's initial collapse. He is also a prime suspect in the suspected murder attempt, which could have caused Terri's medical problems.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, March 17, 2005

Governor Bush requests that Kate Adamson privately speak to members of Florida Senate in hopes of encouraging them to vote to save Terri Schiavo and thousands of others of disabled Americans.

Adamson, survivor of a double brainstem stroke – once unable to stand, she now stands for life; once unable to speak – she now speaks for those with no voice.

Redondo Beach, CA - Disability rights activist Kate Adamson has been asked by Florida Gov. Jeb Bush to join in the fight to save Terri Schiavo.

Although Kate has been involved in this case for sometime now and is close to the Schindler family, on Tuesday the Governor reached out to Kate saying that 'she is the best one' to tell the Florida Senate what Terri will be going through should she be sentenced to death by starvation.

Adamson hopes to put a human face on a story that has generated a media frenzy.

Kate, due to a catastrophic brain stem stroke, was dependent on a feeding tube for all her nourishment and had her feeding tube turned off for over a week. She, unlike most others, can understand what Terri is going through.

"I have suffered the pain and agony of starvation and the excruciating pain that goes along with it. I am here today as a living testimony of what hope can do and what prayer can accomplish. Life is either sacred or meaningless... there is no in between."

Adamson will be reaching out to the Florida Senators on Wednesday & Thursday.

"I have a unique understanding of what Terri is feeling. I could feel everything that the doctors did to me, and I could do nothing. I was at the complete mercy of others, and they couldn't hear me."

For more information about Terri Schiavo, visit http://www.terrisfight.org. For more information about Kate Adamson, visit http://www.KatesJourney.com. To schedule an interview with Kate Adamson, contact her publicist, Wanda L. Sanchez at 209-531-9899 or 209-534-9921.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
SOS2008 said:
Agreed that this is the way it should be. It was mentioned in the earlier thread that Jeb Bush has stepped in on behalf of the parents as Governor--otherwise the wishes of the husband and decisions of judges would have been the final word on it.

The husband loves her more than the parent's who are being selfish.

At this point I can't decide on whether Bush's actions are genunine or if they are just publicity stunts to win the votes of the people who don't want her to die.

As far as the husband loving his wife more than the parents, this is clearly evident in his relentless pursuit to put his life to rest. Why would you want to cause more emotional damage than that which has already been caused.
 
  • #35
Grace said:
Terri will begin to suffer the symptoms of starvation within a few hours. Dehydration will kill Terri in a couple of weeks. She will suffer terribly. Terri's death is an exercise in eugenic murder just like the Nazi campaign to kill German citizens with physical and mental handicaps that preceded World War II and the Holocaust. Americans with disabilities are watching this case anxiously to see whether their lives are threatened.

The would be murderer Michael Schiavo has refused one million dollars simply to transfer his rights as Terri Schiavo's guardian to Terri's parents, Bob and Mary Schindler. Bob and Mary and Terri are Catholics. Michael Schiavo, of course, is a Nazi. He is an adulterer, with two bastard children born since Terri's initial collapse. He is also a prime suspect in the suspected murder attempt, which could have caused Terri's medical problems.


First off, if she is really PVS, she won't know the difference. It would be in her and the family's best interests for Terri's life to be ended. The government stepping in messing with this process is uncalled for and unnecessary.

Your comment referring to Micheal Shiavo as a nazi is completely unwarrented and disgusting. He is looking out for the best interests of his wife. He has been trying to move on with his life. Which is more than can be said for the parents of this poor woman.
 
  • #36
Kerrie said:
Exactly Evo. The hardest thing there is for a parent is to see their child die, I can't even imagine such a horrible thing. I do agree the husband is being less selfish of course because his love for her is a conditional one.

I'm not asking this to be offensive in any way. Is it really in the parents best interests for them to spend their lives watching their daughter remain in a persistent vegetative state? I don't think that would benefit any of the parties involved mentally or emotionally.
 
  • #37
Evo said:
Yes, I can't imagine what the parents are going through, to see their daughter, to be able to touch her, but the reality is that what they see and touch is an empty shell. I hope to never have to be in their situation. It is very sad. Hopefully she feels nothing, how horrible to be able to feel pain for 15 years with no end to it. So, if she feels no pain, withdrawal of the feeding tube is not an issue, if she feels pain, 15 years of not being able to move has to be an incredible torment. Not being able to scratch an itch, or turn if something gets sore, just endless torment.

Agreed. Its not right to let this go on any further than it already has. I too hope I never find myself in their position ever. It saddens me to think about it because your right, it tormenting to physically be able to touch someone but know that the person isn't there at the same time. I have a back problem, which is absolutly NO comparison of course, but when you can't turn to move, its painful and tormenting.
 
  • #38
Evo said:
From the lower brain stem functions she has, she should feel no pain, so removing the tubes should cause no pain.

Evo, would there be any other way to end Terri's suffering without removing her feeding tube? Maybe another way to end it for her that might be a little more humain to make those who are protesting the idea a little more comfortable. Just a thought.
 
  • #39
misskitty,

You have no idea (as do I) on what is going on in the mind of Terry Shiavo. This case is much bigger then starving a human being to death. The point, of this case, is about federal judges making law and overriding the Constitution. They are imposing their worldview on us.

It was reported yesterday in the guardian that the doctors performed a late term abortion on a baby, with a clef lip, because it was deemed severely handicap.

I thought about my mother. She was in a comma for 33 days. Don't be surprised in the very near future that people with stroke, will be ruled unfit for society. Its coming misskitty.
 
  • #40
SOS2008 said:
As stated in the other thread, I wonder how many of these pro-life people who are against removal of life support for terminal patients, are also in favor of capital punishment—very inconsistent people (i.e. hypocritical).

As stated in the other thread, I wonder how many of these anti-life people who are for the removal of life support for terminal patients, are also anti-capital punishment—very inconsistent people (i.e. hypocritical).
 
  • #41
BTW, I watched Kate Adamson is on Sean Hannity today. She was great. She stated that she was aware of all her surroundings and her mind wanted to communicate while she was in a so-called "vegetative state". On a side note, I called in and told Sean exactly what I told misskitty, that this is a slippery slope. In the very near future, judges and doctors are going to determine who lives and who dies.
 
  • #42
Grace said:
BTW, I watched Kate Adamson is on Sean Hannity today. She was great. She stated that she was aware of all her surroundings and her mind wanted to communicate while she was in a so-called "vegetative state". On a side note, I called in and told Sean exactly what I told misskitty, that this is a slippery slope. In the very near future, judges and doctors are going to determine who lives and who dies.
I'm glad to hear that Kate is doing well, though I doubt she was being kept alive for 15 years.

And somehow I'm not surprised to hear this story was on FOX News with Mr. Hannity at the helm--totally trustworthy source of news that would never seek such sensationalism.:eek:
 
  • #43
Grace said:
misskitty,

You have no idea (as do I) on what is going on in the mind of Terry Shiavo.

Is that a joke? You know what's going on in the mind of Terry Shiavo?
 
  • #44
Originally posted by SOS2008
I'm glad to hear that Kate is doing well, though I doubt she was being kept alive for 15 years.
You're right Kate IS lucky, my friend didn't recover from Locked-In syndrome. Kate's condition and my friend is a motor disability only. And yes, my friend is being kept alive and so should Terri Schiavo if all she needs is nourishment like any other human being.

I know Terri's case is different because Terri has a mental disability, but that is still no reason to kill her.
 
  • #45
Michael Schiavo: Loving Husband or Monster?

http://www.opinioneditorials.com/freedomwriters/brogoff_20050222.html
Whenever people discuss euthanasia, you’ll always find those who will defend the odious practice. However, no one defends domestic violence. That leads to the 6 ft. 6 inch, 250 pound problem: Michael Schiavo. The evidence compiled against him suggests a history and pattern of domestic abuse against Terri and other women that is strong and significant. An immediate criminal investigation is warranted.

The main evidence comes from a bone scan taken on March 5, 1991. As Terri’s guardian, Michael Schiavo denied her family access to Terri’s records, the results of which were not made available until November, 2002. This scan indicated numerous broken bones in various stages of healing, including compressions fractures, a broken back, pelvis, ankle, bone bruises and ossifications.

Board certified radiologist Dr. Walker read the scan in 1991 and interpreted the results as abnormal, which he attributed to either an accident or earlier trauma. Based on the remodeling process of her bones, Dr. Walker stated in his deposition that a) the injuries indicated by the scan occurred on or around the time that Terri Schiavo collapsed; b) the abnormalities on the bone scan were not typical of someone suffering cardiac arrest and collapsing to the floor, and c) the fractures indicated by the bone scan are not typical of patients bedridden only thirteen months. As recorded in Dr. Walker’s November 21, 2003 deposition, Terri might have been the victim of foul play via a blow to her body, being thrown into a sharp furniture corner, or assaulted with a blunt object.

On October 24, 2003, renowned forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden was interviewed by Greta van Susteren on Fox News. He disclosed that with low potassium and no elevated enzymes, it would be extremely rare for a young woman to collapse as Terri did from a heart attack. When asked what the bone injuries suggest to him, Dr. Baden replied, “Some kind of trauma. The trauma can be from a fall, or the trauma can be from some kind of beating that she obtained from somebody somewhere. It’s something that should have been investigated in 1991 when these findings were found.”

Other medical testimonies are in agreement. One medical expert testified that a diagnosis of a heart attack was never made. Another testified that Terri’s rigid neck indicates she may have been the victim of strangulation. Psychiatrist and expert witness Carole E. Lieberman, M.D., M.P.H. offered preliminary thoughts and provided a chilling profile of Michael Schiavo as an abusive husband.

Prior to Terri’s collapse, there were serious financial problems in her marriage and her husband Michael tried to control her behavior. He was fired from six jobs in two years, some of which he held only two weeks. They often lived on her income, which Michael often spent on himself. He monitored her odometer and isolated her from her family and friends. On the day of her collapse, Michael and Terri had a bad fight after he accused her of spending too much money at the hairdresser.

.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #46
Kat you present an interesting opinion on this story. My question is, why wasn't there any more investigations of abuse?
 
  • #47
There was a story on the news yesterday morning about the legislature possibly enacting Terri's Law as early as Monday. Which would force them to put her feeding tube back in. This is aweful. I really don't think this should be allowed to continue.
 
  • #48
Grace said:
misskitty,

You have no idea (as do I) on what is going on in the mind of Terry Shiavo. This case is much bigger then starving a human being to death. The point, of this case, is about federal judges making law and overriding the Constitution. They are imposing their worldview on us.

It was reported yesterday in the guardian that the doctors performed a late term abortion on a baby, with a clef lip, because it was deemed severely handicap.

I thought about my mother. She was in a comma for 33 days. Don't be surprised in the very near future that people with stroke, will be ruled unfit for society. Its coming misskitty.

Grace, sincerely I'm sorry about your mother.

No one except Terri knows what she is thinking. Right now she is incapacitated to communicate what she wants to everyone. She did tell her husband that she didn't want to live like this. Because people have been interferring with her wishes, she has been this way for 15 years.

Worldwide opinion has no bering here. It doesn't matter what other people think. Its about what's better for Terri. Which is for her to die and stop living in a manner which she never wanted.
 
  • #49
misskitty said:
Grace, sincerely I'm sorry about your mother.

No one except Terri knows what she is thinking. Right now she is incapacitated to communicate what she wants to everyone. She did tell her husband that she didn't want to live like this. Because people have been interferring with her wishes, she has been this way for 15 years.

Worldwide opinion has no bering here. It doesn't matter what other people think. Its about what's better for Terri. Which is for her to die and stop living in a manner which she never wanted.
No offense intended here..but I find it kind of funny that you say that outside opinion has no bearing here...and then you turn around and give your personal opinon that she should just die..(not to meniton in a rather painful long drawn out manner).
Not only that,. but if it was Terri's wish to just die..according to her husband..why did he pursue and win a law suit based on her medical care for the span of her lifetime in this state..and then afterwards (not sure if it's before or after the new "wife" came along) but after being awarded a large settlement for her care..he suddenly remembers that she wanted to die all along? hello?..
when you take into consideration the money...and the new commonlaw wife and kids...can we say conflict of interest? I can't imagine how the court would allow this guy to be calling the shots here. If someone had her best interest in mind..there'd be bigamy charges, or at the very least adultry charges and divorce and her rights turned over to the state,not to a husband who's best interests are served without her hanging around sucking up all of the money awarded. I'm also curious if there is a life insurance policy that kicks in $$ when she dies?
 
  • #50
Kerrie said:
Kat you present an interesting opinion on this story. My question is, why wasn't there any more investigations of abuse?
I"d like to know that myself. It seems that the judge (greer) has made some bizarre jugdements on the case as well. I'd like to know more, but don't really have the time to research the legalities of investigations on abuse for incapicated adults when it's their legal guardian who would be the abuser.
 
  • #51
Kerrie said:
Kat you present an interesting opinion on this story. My question is, why wasn't there any more investigations of abuse?
Quite frankly, I don't believe a word of that story. That site is just chock full of spin and lies. That they continue to make claims about her condition that directly contradict the opinion of the doctors tells me they can't be trusted.
 
  • #52
Bill S.686 is adopted
 
  • #53
Did the House vote yet? I heard they were going to do that late tonight and Bush was flying into be available to sign it immediately. How sad to turn this poor woman's life into a tug-of-war match by politicians who want to grandstand. Let her die with a little dignity.
 
  • #54
Moonbear said:
Did the House vote yet? I heard they were going to do that late tonight and Bush was flying into be available to sign it immediately. How sad to turn this poor woman's life into a tug-of-war match by politicians who want to grandstand. Let her die with a little dignity.
It's created what could become a pretty severe Constitutional issue, too:

The bill passed and Bush signed it early this morning. But the bill does not call for the re-insertion of the feeding tube (it really can't, since that would kinda be directly contradicting a court order), but rather calls for a federal district court to hear the case. But since when does Congress have the power to demand judicial review? And the USSC has already declined to hear the case. It'll be interesting to see what the court does... my guess is they will simply decline to hear it since the USSC already declined to hear it.

Its also ironic that this is a Florida case: Bush signed a bill that usurps power from his brother's state! (after Jeb tried to usurp the power of the legislature and courts)

Legal issues here: http://news.findlaw.com/legalnews/lit/schiavo/index.html
 
Last edited:
  • #55
Many studies have been undertaken to determine the best care for terminally ill patients. It was discovered that in the last few days before death, patients refuse food, and that is a part of the process of a pleasant death, as it turns out. The patients fare much better going into death if they do not eat, and experience a pleasant euphoria that is increasingly a solution to the pain that may be present in the advanced disease state. Patients are no longer force fed in the last stages of life, it is the most humane treatment. This is practiced in many hospitals that care for the terminally ill.

There would be no horrible pain for her, as she lapses into that euphoria. Maybe there would be some emotional pain, as she realizes on some level, that this life is being ended. What if her vital energies have long ago migrated, from the bed-ridden shell, and she is rejoicing at the severance of her connection to it? Oh, never mind, politicians have taken to this matter, I am sure they will absolutely do what is best.
 
  • #56
Oh please there is no money to be made over Terri, it is just propaganda thrown out there by the parents who are desperate and will try anything. The husband was already offered 1 and 10 million dollars to just walk away but refused both times clearly saying it wasn't about the money. He was awarded 700,000 for her care and 300,000 for the loss of his wife. After 15 years only about 50,000 remains. In 1993 Judge Greer even found that the Shindler's financial motives were just as conflicting as Michael Schiavo's.

The abuse allegation are also simply more propaganda, the judge in charge of the trial threw out the abuse argument because it was irrelevant--there simply was no evidence to suggest that Terri was in an abusive relationship.


The parents have from the very start play the old fashioned character assassination game against Michael Schiavo in a desperate attempt to get their way.
 
Last edited:
  • #57
The Republican party(you know the states rights people) once again are challenging not only the individual rights of the people involved, but also the Florida courts jurisdiction. This is not a federal concern they need to be doing more important things now. Court after court has sided with Terry's husband in this mater, but since they do not like what the state has done they are trying to move it into Federal jurisdiction. They are the ones pulling at the heart string and pandering for votes. I have to wonder what the Republican leadership would be doing if this had been a Democrat cause.
 
Last edited:
  • #58
Dayle Record said:
Many studies have been undertaken to determine the best care for terminally ill patients. It was discovered that in the last few days before death, patients refuse food, and that is a part of the process of a pleasant death, as it turns out. The patients fare much better going into death if they do not eat, and experience a pleasant euphoria that is increasingly a solution to the pain that may be present in the advanced disease state. Patients are no longer force fed in the last stages of life, it is the most humane treatment. This is practiced in many hospitals that care for the terminally ill.

There would be no horrible pain for her, as she lapses into that euphoria. Maybe there would be some emotional pain, as she realizes on some level, that this life is being ended. What if her vital energies have long ago migrated, from the bed-ridden shell, and she is rejoicing at the severance of her connection to it? Oh, never mind, politicians have taken to this matter, I am sure they will absolutely do what is best.

Yes, the corresponding ketosis that ensues provides a natural anesthetic and may even provide euphoria. I believe some of this data derives from physicians studying political activists who have voluntarily starved to death (and therefore are not in a vegetative state such as Terry).
 
  • #59
adrenaline said:
...The Republican party(you know the states rights people) once again are challenging not only the individual rights of the people involved, but also the Florida courts jurisdiction. This is not a federal concern they need to be doing more important things now. Court after court has sided with Terry's husband in this mater, but since they do not like what the state has done they are trying to move it into Federal jurisdiction. They are the ones pulling at the heart string and pandering for votes. I have to wonder what the Republican leadership would be doing if this had been a Democrat cause.


Duh! The US Constitution, a federal document, guarantees the rights of the individual, not the states. The President is required to uphold those rights. The courts merely interpret constitutionality of the law. Congress may pass any law it wishes as long as it can pass constitutional muster. This particular matter has already been heard in federal courts many times; your argument is nonsense.

Apparently a very large majority of both houses voted in favor of passage, why do you see it as a Rebuplican issue?
 
  • #60
GENIERE said:
Duh! The US Constitution, a federal document, guarantees the rights of the individual, not the states.

Where do you get this from? The US Constitution does protect individual rights, but also states that anything it has not explicitly included as a responsibility of the federal government is a matter for states to decide. This particular bill undermines the court system. My understanding is it was worded specifically to apply to Terri Schiavo, and is not written to be generalized to other cases. Since when is it Congress' responsibility to pass legislation for ONE person to force a case back into a court when the court has already rejected the case? They are claiming it is to give her one more chance...how many "one more" chances does she need after 15 years in this condition?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
10K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
13K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 238 ·
8
Replies
238
Views
28K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
14K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K