Plotting f(x) = 9x4-11x3+3x2+1

  • Thread starter Thread starter alpha01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Plotting
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the function f(x) = 9x^4 - 11x^3 + 3x^2 + 1 to identify local minima, maxima, and points of inflection. The first derivative is calculated, revealing local minima at x = 0 and 2/3, and a local maximum at x = 1/4. However, the point of inflection initially identified as approximately 0.029 is disputed, with corrections suggesting it should be x = 1/9 and that there are actually two points of inflection. A critical error noted is the division by (2x-1), which omitted x = 1/2 as a solution, highlighting the importance of careful factorization in finding all critical points. Accurate plotting and analysis of the function are essential for visualizing these features correctly.
alpha01
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Using the local minima, local maxima and points of inflection of the following function, plot the graph:

f(x) = 9x4-11x3+3x2+1

The Attempt at a Solution



f(x) = 9x4-11x3+3x2+1

f ' (x) = 36x3-33x2+6x

= 3x(12x2-11x+2)

= 3x(3x-2)(4x-1)

therefore we have x = 0, 2/3, 1/4

now, finding the second derivative of the function we have:

f '' (x) = 108x2 - 66x + 6

plugging in our values of x into this, we have:

f '' (0) = 6

f '' (2/3) = 10

f '' (1/4) = - 15/4

therefore we have local minima x = 0, 2/3

and local maxima x = 1/4

I have also found 1 point of inflection to be: 0.029...

I have plotted the function using an online function plotter, and the local minima/maxima don't appear to correspond with the actual graph.

Could someone please show in which step i went wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've calculated the correct local max/mins so if you plot from x=-1/3 to x=4/3 you should be able to see them. If you plot a larger range of x-values, these local max/mins will get blurred out.

Your inflection point on the other hand is incorrect. How did you arrive at it?
 
Thanks.. The point of inflection is 9.. i worked it out again.
 
I think there are two points of inflection, and neither is at x=9...maybe you should show me what you are doing to get your answer, so I can see where you are going wrong.
 
0 = 108x2-66x+6

0 = 108x2-54x-12x+6

0 = 54x(2x-1)-6(2x-1)

6(2x-1) = 54x(2x-1)

6 = (54x(2x-1)) / 2x-1

6 = 54x

x = 1/9

sorry i meant 1/9 not 9

is this still incorrect? as u said .. there should be 2 of them..
 
From 0 = 54x(2x-1)-6(2x-1) do you realize this can be factored? From the previous line you should've noticed the quadratic.
The reason why you are missing one of the points of inflection (whatever that is, I never learned it) is because you divided by one of the solutions.

When you divided by 2x-1 this means that x\neq \frac{1}{2} since you cannot divide by 0, but 0.5 is one of the solutions. You just need to be sure you approach the quadratic correctly so as to find all the solutions.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K