Point of application of resultant force from bound vector forces

AI Thread Summary
Determining the resultant force from bound vector forces requires understanding the point of application, as opposed to free vectors where the head-tail rule can be applied easily. In the case of bound vectors, the resultant force's location is calculated relative to a fixed point by summing the products of each force and its respective position. The discussion highlights the complexity of calculating the resultant force when multiple forces are applied at different points on an object. Clarification on the definitions of free and bound vectors is sought, indicating a need for deeper understanding of these concepts. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering the point of application in force calculations.
fog37
Messages
1,566
Reaction score
108
Hello Forum,

in the case of two or multiple free vectors, it is easy to determine graphically (head-tail rule) the resultant vector (magnitude and direction). The resultant vector is also a free vector.
A free vector is actually an infinite number of vectors with the same magnitude and direction but different points of application (equivalence class)

In the case of bound vectors, the point of application matters. For example, if an object has two different forces applied at different points on the extended object. How do we calculate the point of application or the line of action of the resultant force which is the sum of the two applied forces?

Is it possible?
thanks,
fog37
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You calculate the location of the resultant R relative to some fixed point x such that:

Rx = ∑Fixi

I don't really understand your definitions of free and bound vectors as I have never heard those terms before.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top