Poission equation, spherical harmonics, looking for reference

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a derivation for a specific formula related to the Poisson equation and spherical harmonics. A user suggests that Jackson's electrodynamics book might contain the necessary information but has been unable to locate it. Another participant points out that the electrostatic potential can be derived by integrating charge density, referencing Franklin's "Classical Electromagnetism" and Weinberger's "A First Course in Partial Differential Equations" for further details. They emphasize that any comprehensive book on partial differential equations should cover similar material. The conversation highlights the importance of integrating charge density to understand the electrostatic potential in this context.
Derivator
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
Hi folks,

I'm looking for a derivation of the following statement (formula 76)
http://img845.imageshack.us/img845/1550/screenshot4op.png

Do you know any reference, where I can find a bit more detailed description? I reckon, you can find it in Jackson's electrodynamic book, but I couldn't find it.derivator
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if you take a look at the original definition of the electrostatic potential, which is basically given by something proportional to q/|r-r'|. In order to get q, you have to integrate over the charge density rho which is given in your text. The factor of 1/|r-r'| is also given there, so you just have to combine those two and calculate.
 
Try Sec. 4.2.5 in Franklin "Classical Electromagnetism".
 
Weinberger "A first Course in Partial Differential Equations" treats this in his chapter on Legendre and associated functions p 192 ff

But any good book on partial diffs should have a similar treatment.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top