Poisson Brackets: A Simple Example in Classical Mechanics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Poisson brackets in classical mechanics, specifically through Hamilton's equation: \(\frac{\mathrm{d}f}{\mathrm{d}t} = \bigl\{f,H\bigr\} + \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}\). Participants explore the nature of the function \(f\), which is a function of canonical variables \(p\) and \(q\), and its relationship to constants of motion such as angular momentum and linear momentum. The conversation highlights the equivalence of Poisson brackets in classical mechanics and commutators in quantum mechanics, emphasizing their utility in deriving equations of motion for mechanical systems like pendulums and mass-spring systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with canonical variables (p, q)
  • Knowledge of Poisson brackets and their mathematical properties
  • Basic concepts of classical mechanics and dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Hamilton's equations in detail
  • Explore the relationship between Poisson brackets and commutators in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate examples of constants of motion in various mechanical systems
  • Learn about canonical transformations and their implications in Hamiltonian mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on classical mechanics, Hamiltonian dynamics, and the mathematical foundations of mechanics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of Poisson brackets and their applications in physical systems.

snoopies622
Messages
852
Reaction score
29
Could someone show me a simple example of the usefulness of Poisson brackets - for instance, a problem in classical mechanics? I know the mathematical definition of the Poisson bracket, but from there the subject quickly seems to get very abstract.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just thought I'd give this a bump before it disappeared over the page one horizon for good.

(80 views and no replies!)
 
Well, there's always Hamilton's equation:
\frac{\mathrm{d}f}{\mathrm{d}t} = \bigl\{f,H\bigr\} + \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}
This governs the time evolution of any function f of canonical variables. It applies equally well to quantum mechanics if you replace the Poisson brackets with commutators.

If you really want a specific problem as an example, I'm sure I or someone else could look one up, but I couldn't give you one off the top of my head :wink:
 
Thanks, diazona.

Maybe what I should have asked is, what might f be? I know that it's supposed to be a function of p and q, and not energy since that's what H is. What's another function of p and q?
 
When you consider canonical transformations x = (p,q) -> X = (P,Q) (that preserve Hamilton's equations), you have the fundamental requirement (one-dimensional case for simplicity) [q,p]=1 -> [Q,P]=1.

A function L(p,q) (energy, angular momentum, linear momentum,...) is a constant of the motion if and only if it commutes with the hamiltonian [L,H]=0.

If A and B are constants of motion, so is [A,B].

In elementary quantum mechanic, the Poisson brakets are substituted by commutators [A,B]=AB-BA, that have the same properties of PB.

Etc.
 
Last edited:
snoopies622 said:
Maybe what I should have asked is, what might f be? I know that it's supposed to be a function of p and q, and not energy since that's what H is. What's another function of p and q?
Petr gave you some good examples, like angular momentum and linear momentum (I guess that's just p)... but pretty much any physical quantity you can think of can be expressed as some function of q and p in a particular problem. Velocity, angular velocity, position, electric and magnetic fields and potentials, etc.
 
As far as usefulness goes, if I take a simple mechanical system like a pendulum, a mass on a spring or a planet orbiting a massive star, I know how to use

<br /> <br /> \frac {\partial L} {\partial q} - \frac {d}{dt} \frac {\partial L}{\partial \dot {q} } =0<br /> <br />

and

<br /> <br /> \dot {p} = - \frac {\partial H}{\partial q} \hspace {10 mm} \dot {q} = \frac {\partial H}{\partial p}<br /> <br />

to find equations of motion. But are these also situations where

<br /> \frac{\mathrm{d}f}{\mathrm{d}t} = \bigl\{f,H\bigr\} + \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}<br />

might reveal something meaningful as well? What might f represent in these cases? Sorry for my lack of imagination - I really don't know.

(Edit: What I meant was, might the last equation reveal something that the ones above it do not?)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K