Polarisation in dielectrics, anyone?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Clausius-Mossotti equation and its role in understanding polarization in dielectrics. The equation is significant as it relates the dielectric constant of a material to the polarizability of its constituent atoms, which can help deduce molecular structure. Users express difficulty in grasping the implications of the equation and seek clearer explanations. The polarizability is highlighted as a key atomic property that influences the overall dielectric behavior of a material. Clarifying these concepts is essential for a deeper understanding of dielectric polarization.
tessellations
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have been studying polarization in dielectrics recently. I got stuck after coming to Claussius Mossoti equation. I can't understand it's importance. I read that it is used to determine molecular structure but how exactly?
I've just joined this forum, hope someone can help. :) TIA
P.S: Sorry for the typo in the heading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi tessellations! welcome to pf! :smile:
tessellations said:
I got stuck after coming to Claussius Mossoti equation. … I read that it is used to determine molecular structure but how exactly?

hmm :rolleyes: … what distinguishes us from the snakes is our ablility to restrain our use of s's ! :wink:

the polarisability of one atom is the tensor which relates the local electric field to the dipole moment

from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clausius–Mossotti_relation#Dielectric_Constant_.26_Polarizability" …
The polarizability is an atomic property, but the dielectric constant will depend on the manner in which the atoms are assembled to form a crystal.​

so if you know the dielectric constant, and the polarisability of the individual atoms, you can work backwards and find the molecular structure :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
:rolleyes:
I'm still finding it hard to understand its implications.
Anyways, thanks for taking out time to answer me. I'd really appreciate if you or others could explain it in some other manner. :) Thanks!
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'

Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'

So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
View full post »

Similar threads

Paradox in evaluating the Lorentz field in a dielectric
Replies
2
Views
3K
Reason for Optical Isomerism (at electron level)
Replies
2
Views
2K
Dielectrics scattering electromagnetic waves
Replies
2
Views
3K
New Member Introduction - JD Longmire
Replies
2
Views
209
Entanglement and Bell’s inequality Question
Replies
35
Views
5K
Multiple dielectrics in one capacitor
Replies
1
Views
24K
Mechanisms for heating of water by microwaves
Replies
0
Views
3K
Physics Tenure tracks and dead ends in academia
Replies
27
Views
2K
New and Interesting Publications Relevant to the Origin of Life
Replies
4
Views
3K
Interested in Astronomy and Cosmology? Join the Discussion at PF!
Replies
1
Views
671

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top