Pole Dance & Physics: Understand Momentum & Gravity

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LaurenAsh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Pole
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics of pole dancing, specifically the roles of momentum, centrifugal force, and gravity. It is established that increased momentum allows dancers to maintain height and spin longer due to the interaction of centrifugal and gravitational forces. The conversation highlights the differences between static and spinning poles, noting that static poles provide more balance while spinning poles offer greater friction. Key insights include the importance of angular momentum conservation and the effects of friction on performance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centrifugal force and its application in rotational motion
  • Knowledge of angular momentum conservation principles
  • Familiarity with static versus spinning pole dynamics
  • Basic grasp of friction and its role in physical performance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of angular momentum in rotational systems
  • Explore the effects of friction in sports and physical activities
  • Study the mechanics of static versus spinning poles in pole dancing
  • Investigate advanced pole dancing techniques and their physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for pole dancers, dance instructors, sports physicists, and anyone interested in the biomechanics of movement in dance.

LaurenAsh
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi there

I would like to know about the physics involved in pole dance. for instance, why does more momentum make it easier to stay high on the pole and spin for longer? and how does this influence the effect of force on your body by gravity. Basically just the overall physics of pole dance...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Analyzed from the dancer's point of view, there arises fictitious centrifugal forces which point horizontally outwards. This force means that the dancer will not hang vertically down, but make some angle with respect to the pole. You just add the centrifugal force to the gravitational force, and you will find that the faster you spin, the more horizontal you get. This is the same principle behind tether balls.
 
Matterwave thanks for your reply could you give me some more info
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Matterwave said:
You just add the centrifugal force to the gravitational force, and you will find that the faster you spin, the more horizontal you get.
But the downwards component is still the same. So that alone doesn't "make it easier to stay high on the pole and spin for longer". You have to consider the friction at the pole.
 
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...3A60530ACE6D769573FE&view=detail&FORM=VIRE1#a

After watching several of the talented ladies ( All I saw was ladies, no males, doing what should be an Olympic Sport, as it looks to be that someone has to be quite athletic and artistic to appear to make it look easy ), I conclude that there is more to the technique than just a simple answer. Some of the individuals do not slide down the pole when spinning, and not at all that rapidly. Except for the fireman move, and a few other moves, some could hang on the pole with it tucked under there knee joint and spin at one horizontal location. Perhaps a professional pole dancer can provide an answer to their secret.
 
256bits said:
some could hang on the pole with it tucked under there knee joint and spin at one horizontal location.
While increasing the friction involves increasing the horizontal contact forces, it doesn't always involve spinning.
 
Last edited:
256bits said:
Some of the individuals do not slide down the pole when spinning, and not at all that rapidly. Except for the fireman move, and a few other moves, some could hang on the pole with it tucked under there knee joint and spin at one horizontal location. Perhaps a professional pole dancer can provide an answer to their secret.

Not a pole dancer but I have done some pole shopping with my wife.

Some, but not all, dance poles are supported by bearings at the top and bottom so that the pole can spin. Friction between the dancer and the pole can be completely static while she is spinning.
 
Static friction is greatest so having a free rotating pole must help.
When spinning, there is a centripetal force involved and that will increase the friction force (normal force would be proportional to the square of the angular velocity) and reduce the grip needed. For a high enough rotation speed, it would not be necessary to grip at all.

Where does one go "pole shopping", I wonder. (Except in Krakow, perhaps)
 
  • #10
So from a pole dancer point of view there are a few things to keep in mind. First of all there are poles that are static and there are poles that spin. Both give completely different effects while dancing on them (that's why competitions often offer two poles on stage, one being static, the other being spinning)
Static poles give you les friction when you're spinning, so it takes more muscles to stay up/make more spins while spinning. It however gives you way more balance, because when you go upside down for instance you only have to focus on gravity and not on keeping the pole steady making it the better option for 'harder' moves or to practice new moves. The spinning poles provide you with heaps of friction when you're spinning, because the pole is spinning and you yourself are static onto the pole.
The centrifugal force makes the pole accelerate when you are closer to the pole and slow down when you for instance extend a leg or arm.
Other 'funny' forces:
When you stand up straight in the pole (so pole alongside your whole legs) it is harder to grip and stick than when you stand the same way upside down, because of the gravity pulling on the fatty bit of your thighs and that way giving you more surface to stick.
Hope this helps;)
 
  • #11
Linda007 said:
The centrifugal force makes the pole accelerate when you are closer to the pole and slow down when you for instance extend a leg or arm.

Your physics explanation for this is incorrect. You spin faster when you are closer to the pole due to conservation of angular momentum, not due to the "centrifugal force", which is a fictitious force.

This is also an old thread from 2014.

Zz.
 
  • #12
That's alright.

As one the original 2014 contributors to this thread, I'm still interested in new insights on the topic. Poll dancing never gets old :-)
And while Zapper is right about the terminology, I was able to understand what you meant, and I appreciate the new perspective / info on the topic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
956
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
786
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
461