Poll: Opinions on Three Mile Island Nuclear Accident (1979) - NRC Info Included

  • Thread starter idonthack
  • Start date
In summary, the poll results show that most people believe that nuclear power plants are safe, and that people who lived near the Three Mile Island nuclear accident (1979) did not experience any health problems as a result of the accident.
  • #1
idonthack
2
0
I'm doing a school project on the Three Mile Island nuclear accident (1979). One of the requirements is to take a poll of people's opinions, so I'm putting this up here and a couple other places. Please answer these questions, and if you want to know more about what happened at Three Mile Island, go to this URL for some info. http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/3mile-isle.html

Poll
------
How old are you?

Are you male or female?

Do you think that nuclear power plants are safe?

Do you live near a nuclear power plant?

If you were alive during the Three Mile Island nuclear accident, (1979), did you hear about it?

After the Three Mile Island nuclear accident, other power plants built by the same company were shut down for several years. Do you agree with this decision?

During the Three Mile Island nuclear accident, some radioactive gasses were released into the atmosphere. The government said there wasn't enough radiation to cause problems with the surrounding area, but several lawsuits were filed because people believed that it had caused various birth defects, including one case of Down Syndrome. Do you think that these birth defects were caused by the nuclear accident?

-----
Thanks for taking your time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
28,
m,
yes,
yes (20 miles from Limerick, but I used to go to school ~5 miles away),
yes, but I was young,
no.

For the last question, I don't have a real high regard for lawyers, especially personal injury lawyers. Down Syndrome is one of the most common birth defects, so its an easy target and no scientific evidence is required to win a lawsuit (just inuendo that the jury/judge buys or scares the power company enough to settle). A study was done recently tracking cancer rates nearby for the 20 years after the accident. It found no anomolies. So the answer to the question is a long-winded no.

Welcome to the site.
 
  • #3
26,

m,

yes,

yes, a very small research reactor on the NIST campus. Most people don't even know its there.

yes, but I was very young and overseas. I remember Chernobyl. They were telling us not to eat the grass...

no. It wasn't the reactor which caused the problems, it was human error. Proper training would have prevented it entirely. That training would not have taken years.

No. Ditto Russ's comments. If the lawyers want to go after something, they should go after coal plants and asthma cases. They're much worse than any nuclear reactor accident, except possibly Chernobyl.

You may want to add another question asking what the responders do for a living, idonthak.
I'm an engineering graduate student. Russ is an engineer.

Welcome to PF! :smile:
 
  • #4
I played outdoors when a child [>40]
m

yes [I helped build 3 of them]

within a hours drive

I was working at another nuclear plant at the time. Needless to say, we heard about it rather quickly including details that never made the news.

Shutting down the other plants was prudent. The duration of shutdown was ridiculous, though politically expedient.

The level and amount of emissions was trivial. Actuarial risk was calculated to be statistically insignificant at the time. This prediction was confirmed by studies of actual incidence rates over twenty years. Of course this won't stop lawyers who are more interested in fees than facts. It did, however, bring the nuclear power industry to a screeching halt. All new facilities not already under construction were canceled after TMI, which ended the careers of a quite a few people I happened to know, including me. [I subsequently lined up a job at NASA... just before the Challenger disaster... and learned the meaning of the term 'hiring freeze']. You might say I am more familiar than most with the effects of fallout from TMI.
 
  • #5
71

male

yes

no (used to)

yes

no. 1 year would have been sufficient. The companies need to revise their operational methods.

no. Compare incidence of Down's syndrome in a randomly selected population of similar size, demographics, etc. Is incidence in exposed population significantly higher, in the statistical sense?
 
  • #6
18
Male
Yes, when properly maintained (the recent Japan incident comes to mind).
Yes, there is one on my campus as well, Georgia Tech, it has been shut down since the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta.
I was not alive.
No.
I'm pretty confident that if there were a problem, the government would have evacuated all of the people.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
enigma said:
You may want to add another question asking what the responders do for a living, idonthak.

That would have been a good idea if I hadn't already gotten most of my responses :P

But thanks anyways.
 
  • #8
Welcome to PF

idonthack said:
Please answer these questions, and if you want to know more about what happened at Three Mile Island.
1. I am 81and have been substitute teaching since retiring in 1982.

2. Yes, I'm sure that nuclear power is safe. You possibly are unaware that the accident at Chernobyl was with a graphite moderating design that had once been designed in Hanford and ultimately abandoned because of fear that the graphite, being a dense form of charcoal bricks would ignite with high heat.

3. Yes, I think nuclear power is safe.

4. I do not live near nuclear power plant but I did live for 50 years "44 - '94) in and around Los Alamos where "yellow smoke" that resulted from the spontateous ignition of explosive shocked depleted Uranium that served as a shockwave barrier in almost every experiment that my group tested. At that time the yellow smoke was not known to float for so long. Incidentally, there was an undocumented but very high incidence of cancers among longtime residents including mine and that which killied my wife; neither of our families has a single incidence of cancer history.

5. One of the first power reactors was constructed in another part of the building where my duties were still involved with Critical Assemblies of Plutonium weaponry. It was interesting that the "Fast Reactor" heat transfer fluid was liquid Sodium that transferred it heat without the danger of Steam damage into a steam boiler that turned a turbine.

6. Shutting down TMI was SOP as was pausing other activities; a couple of months would have been suficient. The press went overboard about the gigantic gas bubble in the water that had been neutron radiated. The Hydrogen in the bubble didn't explode but gradually neutralized the hydroxyl ions that had been left in the surrounding water.

7. Radiation sickness that is the result of the gamma-ray flash of a bomb is insignificant at TMI. The primary public health issue is due to air-borne fission fragments: 1) Strontium-90,half-life of 29 years, replaces its sister element, calcium , thus affecting lactation and bone structure of victims; and 2) Iodine-131, 8-day half-life, that can find its way into the health problems of the thyroid glands of the victims.

Cheers, Jim
 
  • #9
Poll
------
How old are you? 48

Are you male or female? m

Do you think that nuclear power plants are safe? more or less

Do you live near a nuclear power plant? 50km,50km,50km (6 reactors in total)

If you were alive during the Three Mile Island nuclear accident, (1979), did you hear about it? yes (at the reactor course I attended! focus was on probabilites then!)

After the Three Mile Island nuclear accident, other power plants built by the same company were shut down for several years. Do you agree with this decision? yes

During the Three Mile Island nuclear accident, some radioactive gasses were released into the atmosphere. The government said there wasn't enough radiation to cause problems with the surrounding area, but several lawsuits were filed because people believed that it had caused various birth defects, including one case of Down Syndrome. Do you think that these birth defects were caused by the nuclear accident? maybe
 
  • #10
58 M
Do you think that nuclear power plants are safe?
Almost but regulation needs to be tightened and the present administration is going in the opposite direction.
No
Yes

After the Three Mile Island nuclear accident, other power plants built by the same company were shut down for several years. Do you agree with this decision?
Yes, the company was very reluctant to inform the public.

no
 

Related to Poll: Opinions on Three Mile Island Nuclear Accident (1979) - NRC Info Included

1. What happened during the Three Mile Island Nuclear Accident in 1979?

In 1979, a series of mechanical failures and human errors caused a partial meltdown of the Unit 2 reactor at the Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plant in Pennsylvania. This resulted in the release of a small amount of radioactive material into the environment.

2. Was anyone harmed or killed during the Three Mile Island Nuclear Accident?

While the accident did release a small amount of radioactive material, studies conducted by the National Cancer Institute and the World Health Organization have found no evidence that the accident caused any deaths or long-term health effects in the surrounding population.

3. How did the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) respond to the Three Mile Island Nuclear Accident?

The NRC, the federal agency responsible for regulating the nuclear industry, took immediate action to assess the situation and mitigate the effects of the accident. They also conducted a thorough investigation to determine the causes and implemented new safety regulations to prevent similar accidents from happening in the future.

4. What impact did the Three Mile Island Nuclear Accident have on the nuclear industry?

The Three Mile Island Nuclear Accident had a significant impact on the nuclear industry, leading to increased safety regulations and stricter oversight by the NRC. It also caused a decrease in public support for nuclear energy and a slowdown in the construction of new nuclear power plants in the United States.

5. Is the Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plant still operating?

While the Unit 2 reactor never returned to service after the accident, the Unit 1 reactor at Three Mile Island continued to operate until September 2019. The plant was decommissioned and is currently in the process of being dismantled and cleaned up in accordance with NRC regulations.

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • General Engineering
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
67
Views
8K
Back
Top