Ponctual electric charge problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around solving the problem of finding a point where the net force on a third point charge is zero, given two charges: q1 = 27C at x=0 and q2 = 3C at x=1 meter. The initial approach incorrectly applied Coulomb's law, leading to a flawed quadratic equation. The correct formulation reveals that the distance between q1 and the third charge must be calculated using the corrected denominator (1-d)2 and a negative sign for the second term, ultimately leading to the conclusion that the correct position is at d = 3/2√2 meters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law for electric forces
  • Quadratic equations and their solutions
  • Basic concepts of electric charge and field direction
  • Understanding of point charges in electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Coulomb's Law and its applications in electrostatics
  • Study the derivation and solutions of quadratic equations
  • Explore the concept of electric field direction and its implications
  • Investigate the behavior of multiple point charges in a system
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in electrostatics and the behavior of electric charges in a field.

fishingspree2
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, my answer on the following problem is wrong and I don't see why. I am translating the question from another language, I am sorry if the english is not clear.

Let q1 = 27C localised at x=0, and another charge q2=3C localised at x=1 meters.

a)Besides infinity, find a point where the net force exerced on a third ponctual charge would be = 0.

Solution:
The third charge must be located between q1 and q2 so the forces exerted cancel out.
If is the distance between q1 and the third charge, then 1-d is the distance between q2 and the third charge. Let qx be the third charge.

Then by Coulomb's law:
[tex]0=\frac{kq_{x}q_{1}}{d^{2}}+\frac{kq_{x}q_{2}}{1-d^{2}}[/tex]
k and qx cancel out, we now have
[tex]0=27-54d+30d^{2}[/tex]
This equation has no solution.

However, if we look at things intuitevely, there must be a point where the forces cancel out. the answer is x=0,750 meters.
What is wrong?
Sorry for my english
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fishingspree2 said:
Then by Coulomb's law:
[tex]0=\frac{kq_{x}q_{1}}{d^{2}}+\frac{kq_{x}q_{2}}{1-d^{2}}[/tex]
Two errors here:
(1) The denominator in the second term should be (1-d)^2, not 1-d^2.
(2) The sign of the second term must be negative, since the field from q2 points to the left.
 
From your Coulomb equation I get d^2(q2) = -(1 - d^2)q1 = q1d^2 - q1(1m)

(q2 - q1)d^2 = -q1(1 m)

-24d^2 = -27(1 m)

d^2 = 27/24 = 9/8

d = 3/2*sqrt(2)

It doesn't match your answer, so maybe I messed up. HOWEVER the point of my post is that, your quadratic equation is clearly wrong. Where did you get the d term from?

EDIT: Okay, so DocAl pointed out where the mistake was...
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
905
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K