Position as a function of energy

In summary: Thank you for your participation.In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of position as a function of energy and whether or not it is invertible in physics. The concept of invertibility is clarified as a mathematical property and the discussion is ultimately closed without a clear answer.
  • #1
dsaun777
293
39
I've seen position as a function of time in Newtonian physics and potential energy as a function of position, is there an inverse? Any instance where position is a function of energy eg KE, PE. Maybe this is more appropriate for quantum mechanics or modern physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
dsaun777 said:
Any instance where position is a function of energy eg KE, PE.

I'm not sure what you mean by "position is a function of energy". Obviously in mathematical terms any invertible function can be inverted, and typical potential energy functions are invertible. But that doesn't tell you anything about the physics. You need to explain what you mean in terms of physics before we can answer your question.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
  • #3
PeterDonis said:
and typical potential energy functions are invertible

Really? The gravitational potential energy is typical but the function of position is not invertible - not even in the one-dimensional case.
 
  • #4
PeterDonis said:
I'm not sure what you mean by "position is a function of energy". Obviously in mathematical terms any invertible function can be inverted, and typical potential energy functions are invertible. But that doesn't tell you anything about the physics. You need to explain what you mean in terms of physics before we can answer your question.
For instance, we can make accurate enough predictions for a particles trajectory but there comes a point where we have to measure the particle to define exactly where it is.
 
  • #5
DrStupid said:
The gravitational potential energy is typical but the function of position is not invertible - not even in the one-dimensional case.

Huh? ##1/r## is invertible (except for the edge case of ##r = 0##, but that can easily be handled with limits).
 
  • #6
dsaun777 said:
we can make accurate enough predictions for a particles trajectory but there comes a point where we have to measure the particle to define exactly where it is

What does this have to do with "position as a function of energy"? I still don't understand what you're trying to ask.
 
  • #7
PeterDonis said:
Huh? ##1/r## is invertible

##1/|r|## is not
 
  • #8
DrStupid said:
##1/|r|## is not

It is for the range ##0 < r < \infty##, which is the relevant range.
 
  • #9
PeterDonis said:
What does this have to do with "position as a function of energy"? I still don't understand what you're trying to ask.
Not too sure how to clarify it further. But you sort of answered by saying that potential functions are invertible. Could you elaborate on how they are invertible?
 
  • #10
dsaun777 said:
you sort of answered by saying that potential functions are invertible

Actually, that's not always true; @DrStupid correctly pointed out that in 3 dimensions, the standard gravitational potential function is not invertible (since it depends on the radius and there are multiple positions at any given radius).

In any case, as I said before, "invertible" is a mathematical property, not a physical property. If all you're interested in is what mathematical functions are invertible, that is a separate discussion that belongs in the math forum, not the physics forum. Here we assume your question is about physics.
 
  • #11
dsaun777 said:
Not too sure how to clarify it further.

In that case, this thread is closed.
 

1. What is the relationship between position and energy?

The position of an object is directly related to its energy. This means that as the energy of an object changes, its position will also change. For example, if an object gains energy, it will move to a higher position, and if it loses energy, it will move to a lower position.

2. How does energy affect an object's position?

Energy can affect an object's position in a variety of ways. For example, if an object has kinetic energy, it will be in motion and its position will change as it moves. On the other hand, potential energy can cause an object to change its position by storing energy that can be released to move the object.

3. Can position be a function of more than one type of energy?

Yes, position can be a function of multiple types of energy. For example, an object's position can be influenced by both its kinetic energy and its potential energy. Additionally, factors such as friction and air resistance can also affect an object's position by converting energy into different forms.

4. How is the concept of position as a function of energy used in real-world applications?

The concept of position as a function of energy is used in many real-world applications, such as in physics and engineering. It is used to understand and predict the motion of objects, as well as to design structures and machines that utilize energy to change positions or perform tasks.

5. Can position as a function of energy be applied to non-physical systems?

Yes, the concept of position as a function of energy can also be applied to non-physical systems, such as economic systems. In these systems, energy can represent resources or money, and changes in energy can affect the position or stability of the system. This concept can also be applied to psychological systems, where energy can represent mental or emotional states that influence behavior and decisions.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
Replies
11
Views
971
  • Mechanics
Replies
13
Views
904
Replies
5
Views
874
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
480
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Back
Top