Positive work:direction of external force

AI Thread Summary
When an electron approaches a proton from infinity, its potential energy decreases, indicating that positive work is done as the attractive force acts in the same direction as the displacement. The discussion clarifies that no external force is necessary for this process, as the electron naturally accelerates towards the proton, converting potential energy into kinetic energy. Introducing an external force complicates the scenario, as it would counteract the attractive force, resulting in zero net work and no change in kinetic energy. If an external force is applied to push the electron away, it must be accounted for in the energy calculations, balancing the work done by the attractive force. Overall, the relationship between potential energy, work, and forces is crucial in understanding the dynamics of charged particles.
gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83
If an electron is brought near the proton from infinity,potential energy of the electron decreases so work done must be positive because the change in potential energy is the NEGATIVE of the work done .But how ?I mean for work done to be positive, force and displacement should be parallel to each other here
exter.png

so is the external force which is responsible for doing the work is in the same direction as of direction of displacement?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I presume you are not talking about a quantum analysis of this, as the concept of an electron approaching a photon assumes an exact measurement of position.

So I imagine you're just talking about a classical negatively charged particle approaching a classical positively charged particle. In that case the force is attractive (opposites attract) so the force on the -ve particle is in the same direction as the displacement - both being towards the +ve particle.

That gives positive work.
 
gracy said:
so is the external force which is responsible for doing the work is in the same direction as of direction of displacement?
I am not talking about attractive force rather I am referring to the external force which is responsible for doing the work
 
There is no need for an external force. The -ve particle will fall towards the +ve one without an external force, and positive work will be done in the process. The work will emerge as kinetic energy.

If you want to introduce an external force you need to tell us what it is doing. Is it for instance pushing the -ve particle away from the +ve one in order to slow its descent? In that case you can no longer use a principle that ' the change in potential energy is the NEGATIVE of the work done' unless you also take into account the change in potential energy of the system providing the external force. So you have two options:

1. No external force. The PE net decreases by w. The work done by the attractive force is +w, and the KE of the particle increases by w.

2. An external force is pushing the -ve particle away. Then the external force does work -w, so the net work done is
+w (by the attractive force) + -w (by the external force) = 0
This matches the change in KE of the particle, which is zero.
The PE of the particle decreases by w, which is exactly offset by the increase in PE of the system providing the repulsive force (assuming no work is dissipated as heat). So the change in PE is zero, which matches the work done.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top