Possible to use work-energy theorem from a non-inertial frame?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the work-energy theorem in non-inertial reference frames, specifically regarding a wheel rolling down an inclined plane. The initial assumption is that calculations from the center of mass frame are invalid due to acceleration from gravity. However, it is established that while the center of mass frame is non-inertial, it is still possible to perform calculations by considering the work done by inertia forces and friction. The relevant equations include conservation of mechanical energy, with the final velocity of the wheel expressed as v_{cm,f} = \sqrt{\frac{2mgh}{m+\frac{I_{cm}}{R^2}}}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of translational and rotational motion
  • Familiarity with the work-energy theorem
  • Knowledge of inertia and friction in physics
  • Ability to manipulate equations involving energy conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of non-inertial reference frames in classical mechanics
  • Learn about the role of friction in rolling motion and energy conservation
  • Explore advanced applications of the work-energy theorem in different reference frames
  • Investigate the effects of inertia forces in non-inertial frames
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in the complexities of motion analysis in non-inertial frames.

zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
Consider a wheel of mass m and radius R rolling down a plane inclined at an angle ϕrelative to the horizontal ground. The wheel starts at rest, and does not slip. What is the velocity of the wheel after it has rolled down a height of h?
Relevant Equations
Here is a solution:
$$E_{m_i}=mgh$$

$$E_{m_f}=\frac{mv_{cm,f}^2}{2}+\frac{I_{cm}\omega^2}{2}$$

$$v_{cm,f}=R\omega$$

No non-conservative forces do any work on the system (in particular static friction) so mechanical energy is conserved.

$$E_{m_i}=E_{m_f}$$

$$\implies mgh= \frac{mv_{cm,f}^2}{2}+\frac{I_{cm}\omega^2}{2}$$

$$\implies v_{cm_f}=\sqrt{\frac{2mgh}{m+\frac{I_{cm}}{R^2}}}$$
In learning about translational and rotational motion, I solved a problem involving a wheel rolling down an inclined plane without slipping.

There are multiple ways to solve this problem, but I want to focus on solutions using energy.

Now to my questions. The reference frame in the posted solution is the ground, correct?

Is it possible to perform this calculation from the frame of the center of mass?

I'm going to guess no because the center of mass is accelerating due to gravity. It is not an inertial reference frame. Is this correct? I just wanted to be sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zenterix said:
Homework Statement:: Consider a wheel of mass m and radius R rolling down a plane inclined at an angle ϕrelative to the horizontal ground. The wheel starts at rest, and does not slip. What is the velocity of the wheel after it has rolled down a height of h?
Relevant Equations:: Here is a solution:
$$E_{m_i}=mgh$$

$$E_{m_f}=\frac{mv_{cm,f}^2}{2}+\frac{I_{cm}\omega^2}{2}$$

$$v_{cm,f}=R\omega$$

No non-conservative forces do any work on the system (in particular static friction) so mechanical energy is conserved.

$$E_{m_i}=E_{m_f}$$

$$\implies mgh= \frac{mv_{cm,f}^2}{2}+\frac{I_{cm}\omega^2}{2}$$

$$\implies v_{cm_f}=\sqrt{\frac{2mgh}{m+\frac{I_{cm}}{R^2}}}$$

Is it possible to perform this calculation from the frame of the center of mass?
Yes it is possible but you must take into account a work done by the inertia forces and moreover a work done by friction. The friction does not work relative the ground frame but it do work relative moving frame. Even if the frame moves with constant velocity
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K