Possible webpage title: Can Two Universes Be Exactly the Same in MWI?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Laurelion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubt Mwi
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics, specifically addressing the question of how two universes can be identical except for a single quantum event. Participants clarify that according to MWI, all possible universes exist simultaneously, evolving from quantum events without creating new universes. The concept of decoherence is introduced as a critical factor in understanding how these universes maintain distinct outcomes despite their similarities. Key resources provided include a detailed explanation of decoherence and a comprehensive paper on the topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with quantum decoherence
  • Basic knowledge of quantum events and their implications
  • Ability to interpret scientific papers on quantum physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of quantum decoherence in detail
  • Read the paper on quantum mechanics provided in the discussion: arXiv: quant-ph/0312059v4
  • Explore the implications of the Many-Worlds Interpretation on reality and existence
  • Investigate other interpretations of quantum mechanics for comparative analysis
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of the Many-Worlds Interpretation and quantum theory.

Laurelion
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi to all. :)

First of all I'm not cleary a physician, not even an amateur, only a writer and i hope that a so low level of knowledge don't offend anyone ^^' (my bad level and my broken english :look: )

So:

I have a question about the MWI. According with the most serious interpretation: we don’t have new universes that have been “create” every time, we already have “all” universe growing up in the same time, I have a doubt: how it can possible that two universe are “literally” the same universe except for one, single quantum event?

I mean: our universe is the result of billions and billions and billions and billions (ecc) of elements that reactive each other in a billions and billions and billions and billions of different way for a very, very, very, very, very long time. How is possible that two universe product the same result?Now I try to see the problem in this way.

In the Schrödinger experiment I put in the box George W. Bush (enough cat, poor animal… let him alone), with poison, electron and measurement tool. With spin positive I have a Bush live, with spin negative I have Bush not very well (I don’t want to write “dead” cause I’m scared of the agency :look: ).

Ok the experiment begin and in our universe the spine is positive, Bush is stile alive. This means that there is another universe with a Bush “not very well”?

No, means that in another universe there is an electron with a negative spin, but in a different position or state, very probably there is no bush, no box, no poison and no earth.This way to see is compatible with the MWI? If not I return to first question, how is possible that so many variation are almost perfectly the same?Sorry for my broken English.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Laurelion said:
According with the most serious interpretation: we don’t have new universes that have been “create” every time, we already have “all” universe growing up in the same time,

No problem about the English.

In MW the universe simply evolves - that's it.

To understand further you need to become acquainted with decoherence:
http://www.ipod.org.uk/reality/reality_decoherence.asp

As a result you end up with what's called an improper mixed state purely by quantum evolution. Each outcome is 'in' that state and the interpretation is they are separate worlds.

Its a bit difficult to discuss the detail at the beginner level. However for completeness the following gives the detail:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0312059v4.pdf

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K