Potential difference between charged parallel plates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of potential difference between charged parallel plates, emphasizing the relationship between the electric field (E-field) and distance. It clarifies that using the formula for electric potential, V=kq/r, is inappropriate due to the issue of r approaching zero when dealing with conductive plates. The conversation highlights that as a positive charge (q) approaches a positively charged plate, charge redistribution occurs, preventing r from reaching zero. This understanding is crucial for accurately calculating potential differences in electrostatics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and potential difference
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's law and electric potential formulas
  • Knowledge of charge redistribution in conductive materials
  • Basic principles of electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of electric fields between parallel plates
  • Explore charge redistribution effects in conductive materials
  • Learn about the implications of point charge models in electrostatics
  • Investigate the relationship between electric potential and electric field strength
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone studying electrostatics or working with charged systems will benefit from this discussion.

Robin64
Messages
34
Reaction score
3
So we know that the E-field between two parallel plates is constant and that the potential difference between the plates is just the E-field times the distance between the plates. Let's say we're moving a positive charge from a negatively charged plate to a positively charge plate ( or near), and instead of using the E-field and distance between the plates to calculate the potential difference, we instead just want to use the formula for electric potential, V=kq/r. How do we deal with the r=0 that inevitably crops up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The V=kq/r formula is for forces between two point particles, not two plates. To use it you need to focus on a positively charged particle, call it p, on the positive plate, and the forces between that and the moving positive particle, call it q. But since the plate is conductive, as q nears the plate, p, as well as all other positive particles, will move away from the point on the plate that q is approaching, so we will never get to a situation where r is zero. Even if we could somehow attach q immovably to a point on the plate, a new equilibrium would be achieved in which all the other positive particles arrange themselves at a distance from p.
 
That makes sense. I completely forgot to consider that the charge redistribution that would occur with a charge near a plate with like charge.

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
20K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K