Potential Energy between two protons?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
12 replies · 11K views
MCATPhys
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Say you have two protons 10nm apart (at rest). If they are released, they naturally tend to accelerate away from each other. But what's the velocity after they are very far apart?

Basically, all the initial potential energy gets converted to kinetic energy. So I equal them to each other like this:

PE = qV = kq^2/.000000010 = 0.5mv^2

q is the charge of the proton, k is the constant, m is the mass (1.66*10^-27), v is the final velocity

When I solved it, the answer I get is around 5.3*10^3 m/s... but the right answer is supposed to be 3.8*10^3

Can someone please tell me what I am doing wrong... just the theory.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I tried equaling the initial potential energy to mv^2 (with the mass being that of a proton) - and the answer is still wrong
 
(9*10^9)(1.6*10^-19)^2/.000000010 = (1.66*10^-27)v^2
v = 3725 = which is pretty close to 3.8*10^3 i guess

Is that the answer you are talking about?

But I don't understand why I would use the combined mass of both protons in the kinetic energy 1/2mv^2.

The potential energy should equal the kinetic energy of each of the two protons:
PE = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2mv^2 (m is the mass on of one proton)
PE = mv^2

But why do we use the combined mass for m?
 
MCATPhys said:
(9*10^9)(1.6*10^-19)^2/.000000010 = (1.66*10^-27)v^2
v = 3725 = which is pretty close to 3.8*10^3 i guess

Is that the answer you are talking about?
I got 3795 m/s - the difference is probably due to rounding off.

But I don't understand why I would use the combined mass of both protons in the kinetic energy 1/2mv^2.
Anything that moves has kinetic energy. Here we have two protons moving at the same speed. Proton 1 has kinetic energy (1/2)mv2 and proton2 also has kinetic energy (1/2)mv2. Their total kinetic energy is (1/2)mv2 +(1/2)mv2 = 2x(1/2)mv2 = mv2

The potential energy should equal the kinetic energy of each of the two protons:
PE = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2mv^2 (m is the mass on of one proton)
PE = mv^2
You are confused. The potential energy should equal the sum of the kinetic energies of the two protons. That's what
PE = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2mv^2
is saying.
But why do we use the combined mass for m?
That's because the masses are the same and the speeds of the protons are the same because of momentum conservation. If the speeds and masses were not the same, you would have to write

PE = (1/2)m1v12 + (1/2)m2v22.
 
I understand what you are saying... the initial potential energy should equal the sum of the kinetic energies of each of the two protons... which means..

PE = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2 mv^2 (but each represents one proton, therefore the m should be for one proton... why do we use the mass of both protons for m?)

btw... you are being very helpful... and thanks so much :)
 
nevermind nevermind - bit of a confusion in the book... now i get it... we were using the single mass only
 
btw... did you round off to get 3795 m/s - because i didn't do any rounding off
 
MCATPhys;2724121... said:
PE = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2 mv^2 (but each represents one proton, therefore the m should be for one proton... why do we use the mass of both protons for m?)
I am not sure what you are asking here. In the equation, the symbol "m" stands for "the mass of one proton" and can be replaced with 1.67x10-27 kg.
 
kuruman said:
I did the calculation on a spreadsheet and got 3794.733192. I calculated

[tex]v=\sqrt{\frac{kq^2}{md}}[/tex]

yeah - that looks right... but I'm guessing you meant q^2 in the above equation