Potential energy greater total energy in the system?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between potential energy (PE) and total energy (TE) in classical mechanics, specifically in the context of a graph depicting these energies. The potential energy curve, which represents a linear simple harmonic oscillator with the function U = 1/2 kx², is observed to be above the total energy line at several intervals, leading to confusion regarding the implications of this positioning. The conversation emphasizes that in classical mechanics, movement is restricted to regions where total energy is less than potential energy, and any scenario where kinetic energy becomes negative is deemed "forbidden." The discussion also touches on gravitational potential energy, defined as U = mgh, which can yield negative values depending on the reference point.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with potential energy functions, specifically U = 1/2 kx² for harmonic oscillators
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential energy, U = mgh
  • Basic grasp of energy conservation laws in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of energy conservation in classical mechanics
  • Research the behavior of potential energy functions in different physical systems
  • Examine the concept of forbidden energy regions in classical mechanics
  • Explore the differences between classical mechanics and quantum mechanics regarding energy states
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching classical mechanics, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of energy relationships in physical systems.

shredder666
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
First of all this is not a HW question, I already "handed" the assignment in and its graded

There was this question on my assignment, it asked questions off of a graph that had distance on the x-axis and energy on the y axis.
The potential energy was a curve, and basically took up the entire page.
the total energy was just a horizontal line and intercepts the PE curve at several points.

But the strange thing was that the TE line was below the PE curve at several intervals. Which just totally confuse me, cus the potential energy is greater than the total energy... or is that some sort of convention that i don't know about
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From a classical point of view, the movement of the object is restricted to the zone where total energy is less than potential energy.
The other regions are "forbidden" in the sense that, within those zones, the kinetic energy is less tan zero and it would lead to an imaginary speed.
QM predicts another behavior, but I think you're looking for a "classical" answer
 
yes, I am looking an answer that does not involve the word "quantum".
So I don't get why that portion is there, is it some sort of bad question making?
 
The potential energy is a function eg. the potential energy for a linear simple harmonic oscillator is 1/2kx2---the function is real for all real x---- but there are constraints on x put by limits of total energy. But the potential energy is still a function and it can have the corresponding value for an x that gives an imaginary speed----if that were possible.
 
shredder666 said:
But the strange thing was that the TE line was below the PE curve at several intervals. Which just totally confuse me, cus the potential energy is greater than the total energy... or is that some sort of convention that i don't know about
For gravitational potential energy the potential energy function is liner U=mgh. It can get negative.In order to lift something at point p1 that is below your reference point at O set to 0 you must do work w=-mgh(h distance from p1 to O).Since gravitation is a conservative force and you are measuring with respect to some point the increase in Kinetic energy from O to p1 is equal to w so your total energy will be unchanged.No problems and no quantums.For a spring this is not possible since U=(1/2)kx^2 so if you get -U there is a problem..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K