Power and Tq Needed to keep a car rooling at speed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dieseltwitch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Power Speed
AI Thread Summary
To maintain speed in a car, the power and torque required depend on various forces, including air resistance, tire friction, and incline. The user calculated that approximately 16 kW (20 hp) is needed to keep a 2005 Jetta TDI at 75 mph on flat ground, based on a force of 446 N. When accounting for a 6% incline, the total force increases to about 1324 N, resulting in a power requirement of 45 kW (60 hp) to maintain the same speed uphill. The calculations consider factors like drag coefficient and vehicle weight, and the user notes that they are operating at about 3/4 throttle under these conditions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding how to translate power requirements into motor torque and horsepower, especially when factoring in gear ratios.
Dieseltwitch
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Power and Tq Needed to keep a car rolling at speed

Ok so I am working on a personal project to formulate hybrid systems for a given car.
Before i can do any of the electrical math however i need to find how much power and tq it takes to no only get the car moving but keep it moving (flat & any given degree of climb)

I found a site that shows me some basic stuff on how to find the forces acting on a car by the air at a given speed

Road Load Force = a + bv + cv^2

a = Resistance from brake pads, or friction in the wheel bearings
b = Friction of the tires
c = Drag Coefficient
v = VelocityThe formula is great I'm sure... BUT THEY DIDN'T GIVE ANY DAMN UNITS!
- some one help me please.
- How do you tie the Dc into every thing? I did some looking around and found a dc 0.31 for my car
- I also have no idea how to account for a car going up a slope, any one?
- How can i account for alt changes and temp changes? ( i think i need a simple formula for Pressure density)I did find a quick and easy formula and found that i have about 446n acting on the front of the car at 120 kph or 75 mph. this in turns translates to ABOUT 16kw of power needed to keep the car at speed. what I'm wondering is where is this power applied. is this motor power? or just power needed at the wheel? i know from school that through gearing HP is divided by the gear ratio and Tq is multiplied by the gear ratio... so how to i translate the 16kw it to Tq and HP at the Motor taking into account the tires?

Thank you for any help you guys/gals have to give. let me know if you need any other numbers.

just for Ref the car is a 05 Jetta TDI and weighs in at 3,300 lbs or 1,500 kgs
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think i figured it out.

Ok so here is what i did... (CHECK ME and let me know if i messed it up)
First i needed to find the force on my car. being that the force changes dynamically with the speed of the car.

I ran the car up to 85 mph and pushed in the clutch. Then I let it fall from 85 mph to 80 mph and started a timer. I then waited till it fell to 70 mph.

80 to 70 mph = 15 seconds
Avg Speed = 75 mph (121 kph)
Acceleration = .9778 f/s/s (.2980 m/s/s)

Knowing the acceleration from 80 to 70 mph i can then find the force acting on the front of the car

F = M*A

Mass of the Car = 3300 lbs or 1497 kg


F = 1497*.2980
F = 446 N

Power needed to Maintain 75mph (121 kph) = F * Av
Av = Avg speed (m/s) = 34 m/s

Power = 446 * 34

Power = 15,000 Watts (15 Kw) or 20 Hp

So from what i found it take 20 Hp to maintain 75 mph on flat ground (where i tested the forces on the car)

Now for the hills...

the Weight (force acting strait down) of my car:

1497kg * 9.8 m/s = 14671 N

For this i will use a 6% grade or 3.43 degs
the force traveling parallel to the road (pushing car back down the hill)

Fp = sin(deg) * Fd

Fp = Force parallel (N)
deg = 3.43
Fd = Force down or Weight (N)

Fp = sin(3.43)*14761

Fp = 878 N

By adding tFp to the force found on level road i think i came up with the force need to keep the car traveling at 75 mph up a 6% grade.

446 n +878 n = 1323.87 n

with the same speed (34 m/s) this comes out to and additional 30 kw or 40 hp for an over all need of 45 kw (60hp) to maintain 75 mph @ 6% grade with a 3300 lbs

So that's what "I" got let me know if i got this right.

just as a note. I am about 3/4 throttle at 75 up a 6% slope (avg highway mtn pass here in Colorado) my car has 100 hp and 200 ft-lbs of tq. given some room for power loss do to the 9000 ft above sea level. 60 hp seams about right
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top