Power calculations for a motor spinning a turntable

AI Thread Summary
A 1 HP motor can spin a 1kg turntable with a 25cm diameter at 2000rpm, but doubling the diameter to 50cm does not necessarily require a 2 HP motor for the same speed. The power needed for constant rotation primarily depends on overcoming axial friction and, to a lesser extent, air resistance. While larger diameters increase air resistance due to higher tangential speeds, the impact on power requirements is not straightforward. The moment of inertia plays a role in acceleration, but for steady-state spinning, the power needed is largely unaffected by size and mass if friction is minimal. Thus, the actual power requirement may not double, depending on frictional losses.
mapika123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Physics question
Relevant Equations
Energy/power- w/speed
Hi, I have a 1 HP motor spinning a turntable (just a wheel) weighing 1kg, diameter 25cm speed 2000rpm. (Arbitrary specs). If I have to spin a turntable with the same weight (1kg) but double the diameter (50cm) at the same speed, would I necessarily need a motor with double the power (2 HP)? There is no load on the turntable, ( just spinning).

Thank you kindly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mapika123 said:
Homework Statement:: Physics question
Relevant Equations:: Energy/power- w/speed

Hi, I have a 1 HP motor spinning a turntable (just a wheel) weighing 1kg, diameter 25cm speed 2000rpm. (Arbitrary specs). If I have to spin a turntable with the same weight (1kg) but double the diameter (50cm) at the same speed, would I necessarily need a motor with double the power (2 HP)? There is no load on the turntable, ( just spinning).

Thank you kindly.
Welcome to PF.

Is this for homework? What equations do you know so far for spinning a circular disk?

And just to keep a disk spinning, all you have to do is overcome bearing friction. To accelerate it up to speed, that is where it takes more power.

Are you familiar with the equations involving the "Moment of Inertia" (MOI) of spinning objects?
 
The power you need to maintain a certain speed depends on your losses. In the limit that no energy is lost while the turntable is spinning, you need no power to keep it spinning. That's Newton's first law.

Argh! @berkeman preempted me.
 
mapika123 said:
Homework Statement:: Physics question
Relevant Equations:: Energy/power- w/speed

Hi, I have a 1 HP motor spinning a turntable (just a wheel) weighing 1kg, diameter 25cm speed 2000rpm. (Arbitrary specs). If I have to spin a turntable with the same weight (1kg) but double the diameter (50cm) at the same speed, would I necessarily need a motor with double the power (2 HP)? There is no load on the turntable, ( just spinning).

Thank you kindly.
The power needed for constant rotation is not related (much) to the speed, mass or size. It depends on axial friction and a bit on air resistance.
The axial friction may be proportional to the mass. The air resistance will be a bit more for the larger size, particularly because that will increase the tangential speed at the periphery.
So it's hard to say without knowing how much each resistance contributes. If we assume no axial friction and air resistance rises as the square of the linear speed at a given radius then for the disc as a whole it would rise as the fourth power of the radius (##\int kr^2\omega^2.2\pi r.dr##). But likely it is mostly axial friction, so you might see hardly any difference.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top