Power expansion of the Dirac Delta function?

andresordonez
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Hi, I hope this is the right place to ask this

Is it possible to expand the Dirac delta function in a power series?

\delta(x)=\sum a_n x^n

If so, what's the radius of convergence or how can I find it?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
andresordonez said:
Hi, I hope this is the right place to ask this

Is it possible to expand the Dirac delta function in a power series?

\delta(x)=\sum a_n x^n

If so, what's the radius of convergence or how can I find it?

Thanks.
No. A function can be represented by a power series in a neighborhood of 0 only if it is analytic there. The delta function is not analytic. It is (from a mathematics point of view) not even a function.
 
Thanks
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top