Power generated by elite runner.

  • Thread starter Thread starter tedjan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the power output of elite runners, particularly focusing on sprinting and longer distances like a 5K. It details how to calculate power in watts using kinetic and potential energy formulas, exemplified by Usain Bolt's sprinting power output of approximately 1500 watts. The conversation also touches on the impact of factors like wind resistance on actual power output, suggesting that overcoming drag requires additional energy. Additionally, comparisons are made to power outputs in other sports, such as cycling and stair racing, with specific wattage figures provided for various activities. The thread concludes with inquiries about calculating power for different runner weights and speeds.
tedjan
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I’ve been interested in finding out how much power in watts a runner can develop.

There are actually two cases that I was interested in; one was for sprinting and the other was for running at a constant speed for an extended period of time, such as, for a 5K.

The second one is a bit complicated, but the case of the sprinter is pretty easy if you look at the kinetic energy after they leave the blocks.

The kinetic energy is half the mass times the velocity squared. It’s measured in joules. If you divide that by the time, it gives you the power in joules per second or watts.

Usain Bolt is a good example. He weighs 198 lbs or 90 kg. He runs the 100 m in about 10 sec, so his average speed is about 10 m/s.

If he starts from a dead stop and accelerates to his average speed in about 3 seconds, then his kinetic energy at 3 seconds into the sprint is 0.5 x 90 x 10^2 or 4500 joules. If he generates that much energy in 3 seconds, he is generating about 1500 watts. That’s the same as 2 horsepower.

You can also calculate how much power a stair-runner generates when they run up a tall building. Then the energy generated would be the potential energy of the runner at the top of the building. (The potential energy at the bottom is zero.) The potential energy is the runner’s weight multiplied by gravity and by the height of the climb.

The Taipei 101 is a race to the top of a tall building. The race is 91 floors or 390 meters. If a 150 lb or 68 kg runner reaches the top of that building, they have generated 68 x 9.8 x 390 or 260,000 joules. If they do that in 16 mins or 960 seconds, then they are generating about 270 watts of power. That’s about a third of a horsepower.

Some cyclists train with hubs on their bikes that measure their power output. A cyclist may actually train at the 270 watt level, so about 250 to 300 watts is pretty reasonable for a stair racer.

I think that’s interesting,

Ted

http://members.aol.com/MathPhysicsModel/SM/SM.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
tedjan,

I like this post. Was looking at power output in watts across several athletic areas - walking, biking, sprinting, weightlifting, etc.

I understand your reasoning on Usain but have a question: Usain achieved his kinetic energy by overcoming wind resistance - so didn't he have to put out even more than 1500 watts to get to his speed? Said another way: If you want to focus on just his acheivement of speed, then I agree with your answer. But if you wanted to measure exactly his output or effort to get to that speed, then it would be his speed + the forces working against him (like drag). Does that sound right?
 
This thread is from 2008 and the OP hasn't been back since November 2009.

Check the thread details before responding to avoid necroposting.
 
JaredJames,

Thanks for tip on checking thread details. I'm new to these forums.

I was actually trying to follow laws of physics, not disobey them. If a 1000 kg car accelerates at a rate of 5 m/sec, then we could conclude the engine put out 5000 Newtons of "thrust" forward (F=ma; 5000 = 1000 * 5). But if we knew that wind resistance was exerting a force of 200 Newtons in the opposite direction, then the engine is putting out 5200 Newtons to achieve the 5 m/sec acceleration. Although this example is with force and not power, it is the same concept I was trying to apply to Usain. Make sense?
 
Sorry to be out of touch on this post. I’ve been working in another problem area. Regarding the Bolt question the aerodynamic drag equation is very useful to estimating the drag. NASA has an excellent discussion at:

http://wright.nasa.gov/airplane/smeaton.html

Mr. Bolt’s velocity at 10 m/s is about 23 mph, his frontal surface area is approximately 8 ft^2. Then, 0.00327 * 23^2 * 8 or approximately 13 lbs of drag. I actually think it would be a single digit number value, about 6 lbs of drag.

Ted
 
I remember reading a book on manpowered flight in which the author suggested that a fit cyclist could sustain about 1/3rd of a horsepower and they tried to design their aircraft to use less than that. When looking for a suitable pilot they said they quickly discovered it was easier to teach a racing cyclist to fly than turn a pilot into a racing cyclist.
 
Yes, Brian Allen powered the Gossamer Albatross across the Channel with about 400w.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gossamer_Albatross

Typical values are stated in terms of 'mass' spicific power of watts/kg. That works out to about 3.5 w/kg for continuous specific power output. Short term specific power can be multiples of 3.5 w/kg. Good continuous power examples are found in cycling, swimming (P/m=Fv/m) and stair racing (P/m=gh/t).

It's fun to measure your own specific power output by running up a few flights of stairs.

Ted
 
Recently a human powered helicopter hovered for > 1min and reached > 3m altitude. Here the info about the pilot/engine:

http://www.aerovelo.com/projects/helicopter/tech-info/
The average power required for a 1 minute Sikorsky Prize flight is currently estimated at 550 Watts for an 80 kg pilot like Todd. The figure below shows the power output of the average fit male, alongside that of cycling legend Eddy Mercks, and two recent laboratory ergometer tests from Todd Reichert. All of Todd’s is training is focused on efforts of 5 minutes or less, which is why his numbers exceed that of Merckx who was typically more of an endurance athlete. At 772 Watts for 1 minute, our pilot’s power output exceeds the power requirements of the helicopter by a safe margin.

Here a plot of power vs duration:
http://www.aerovelo.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/athletepower.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
tedjan said:
Those are very interesting numbers. The last sentence is about 1 HP for 1 min. Thanks.
For longer durations check out the Daedalus human powered aircraft. It flew for several hours. They switched the pilot several times during the project, and ended up with 3 professional cyclists in 3 day training rotation, to have one rested guy everday, when the right weather comes. The power is mentioned somewhere here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZjHcjyLprw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dhlt1fsnhVE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdwLB0yoGmE
 
  • #11
Ted,

What is the power for the 5k runner?

How fast do you think a 90 kg runner would have to run to produce the same power as an olympic runner who weighs 50-60 kgs?

Can someone aid me in calculating watts for running? A.T. has been helping me a bit on a question I asked in the forum. The discussion is evolving now but if you're bored i'd be interested in your opinions.
 
Back
Top