Power Series of X^3/(e^x-1) up to x^4

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kites
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The power series for the function x3/(ex-1) up to x4 can be derived using the Taylor series expansion and geometric series techniques. The initial approach of evaluating the Taylor series directly at x=0 leads to an indeterminate form, necessitating alternative methods. Utilizing the Taylor expansion for ex and performing polynomial long division or applying the Newton-Raphson technique for series division yields the series: x2 - x3/2 + x4/12 + O(x5).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor series and their applications
  • Familiarity with geometric series and their expansions
  • Knowledge of polynomial long division techniques
  • Basic principles of the Newton-Raphson method for finding roots
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about Taylor series expansions for various functions
  • Study the geometric series and its applications in calculus
  • Explore polynomial long division in detail
  • Investigate the Newton-Raphson method and its use in power series division
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematicians working with series expansions, and anyone interested in advanced techniques for deriving power series in mathematical analysis.

Kites
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the power series of x^3/(e^x-1) and keep terms through x^4

Homework Equations



Taylor series

f(x) ~ f(a) + f '(a)*x + f ''(a)/2!*x^2...

The Attempt at a Solution



Taking the first term f(a) around the point 0 shows 0/0 so I discarded that and moved on. But this happens in each of the terms for the series. To try and double check this I punched it into Wolfram Alpha which spit out

around x=0:
x^2-x^3/2+x^4/12-x^6/720+x^8/30240+O(x^9)

I am confused how wolfram alpha obtained this and where I am going wrong. Thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mathematica takes the limit as x tends to 0 for every term. That said you're being asked to find the power series, are you certain they want you to calculate the Taylor series?

You can find the power series by comparing it to a geometric series.
 
You need to take the limit for x to zero if you want to use the formula for the Taylor expansion. This is not an efficient way to compue the Taylor series. A more efficient method is to substitute the Taylor expansion for e^x and then perform the division. Alternatively, you can use the power series of the geometric series.

So, we have:

x^3/[exp(x) - 1] =

x^3/[x + x^2/2 + x^3/6 + x^4/24 + ...] =

x^2/[1+x/2 + x^2/6 + x^3/24 +...]


If you use the geometric series power expansion, you use that:

1/(1+y) = 1 - y + y^2 - y^3 + ...

and substitute

y = x/2 + x^2/6 + x^3/24 + ...

in here.

If you want to do a division, you can do long division. You can also write the expansion in undetermined form:


x^2/[1+x/2 + x^2/6 + x^3/24 +...] = a x^2 + b x^3 + c x^4 + ...

(note that we can immediately tell that the series expansion will start with x^2).

If you multiply both sides by 1+x/2 + x^2/6 + x^3/24 +... and equate the coefficients of the powers of x you can solve for a, b , recursively. This procedure is equivalent to long division.


Then there exist a much faster way to do division of power series that is based on the Newton-Raphson technique of findng zeroes of nonlinear equations. This works as follows. In case of division of ordinary numbers, we need to compute 1/y where y is some given number. Then this amounts to solving the equation

1/x - y = 0

for x.

Newton-Raphson then gives you successive approximants x_n that satisfy the recursion:

x_{n+1} = x_{n} - (1/x_{n} - y)/(-1/x_{n}^2) =

2x_n - y x_{n}^2

Since this algorithm does not contain any divisions, it is a bona fide division algorithm.

Now, this recursion can also be used for power series. If y is not a number but a power series and x_0 is 1/y correct to zeroth order, then the algorithm will yield the x_n as the expansion of 1/y correct to
order 2^n-1. The number of correct expansion coefficients doubles at each iteration, while in case of long divsion you only get one coefficient per step.
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K