Power spectrum of short signals

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the power spectrum of short signals (200-500 ms) presents challenges, as standard methods like FFT yield inaccurate results for these durations. While FFT works well for longer segments, it struggles with short ones due to insufficient sampling of frequency components. The key issue is ensuring that each frequency component is sampled at least once per cycle to obtain reliable data. Users are seeking alternative algorithms optimized for short segments to improve accuracy. Understanding the relationship between segment length and the signal's bandwidth is crucial for effective analysis.
tct212
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am looking for a way to calculate the power spectrum of short signals of variable duration (between 200 and 500 ms). Standard methods seem wildly inaccurate. Are there any tricks for short segments?

Thanks anyone for a response.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have access to Matlab, you should be able to take the FFt of the signal, square it and get your power spectrum. Do a google search for Power Spectrum and Matlab and you'll get a load of hits.
 
For short signals?

Thank you Dr Transport. Yes I do have access to Matlab and FFT works great for segments longer than 500 ms. When the segments are short, fft does a very bad job. I am looking for some improved algorithm that may be better optimized for short segments. Any insights would be appreciated.
 
The length of the segment in ms does not matter. What matters is the length of the segment relative to the longest period of the signal of interest (i.e. the bandwidth of the signal).
You need at sample at least one entirely cycle of each frequency component you are trying to extract in order to get sensible results; my guess would be that you are hitting that "limit" when you go below 500 ms.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top