Poynting vector. Conservation theorem.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating electric and magnetic fields, specifically focusing on the Poynting vector and the conservation theorem. The user finds that the magnetic field B is zero, leading to a Poynting vector S of zero, raising questions about its significance. They also struggle with verifying the conservation theorem, particularly in regions outside the particle's trajectory, where they assume no charges are present. The consensus is that the static nature of the fields implies no energy transfer, suggesting the user may need to reassess their expressions for the electric and magnetic fields. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding field behavior in relation to energy conservation.
lailola
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
I'm doing a problem where I have to calculate the electric and magnetic fields. I've found B=0, so S=ExB=0. Has it got any meaning?

Then I calculate the energy density e=E^2 + B^2 = E^2. And finally I have to verify the conservation theorem grad(S)+de/dt=0 for points out of the particle's trayectory. I do this part but the conservation theorem is not satisfied. What is the significance of "out of the particle's trayectory"? Or maybe I've got wrong expressions for E and B...

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Has it got any meaning?
Your field is static and does not transfer energy.

What is the significance of "out of the particle's trayectory"?
You can assume that there are no charges in the (infinitesimal) volume where you verify the relation.
 
mfb said:
Your field is static and does not transfer energy.


You can assume that there are no charges in the (infinitesimal) volume where you verify the relation.

So, when I do the time derivative of the energy density it must be zero. Then, I think I haven't got the correct expressions for the fields.

Thanks a lot for your help!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top