Practical implementation of focused UV laser

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of implementing a UV laser for creating 13-micron dots at 405 nm. The original poster, Mike, is considering using a cheaper Chinese laser and a spatial filter to achieve the desired focus, but is concerned about potential complications. Responses suggest using a microscope objective in reverse to focus the beam and employing a spatial filter to refine the output. The cost of the necessary equipment, including laser and fiber coupling, is a significant concern for Mike, as it approaches $2000. The conversation highlights the balance between cost and achieving precise laser focusing for imaging applications.
Mike_In_Plano
Messages
700
Reaction score
35
As a quick heads up, I'm buried over my head in an imager project, and the portion that has given me the most headache is the UV source.

Essentially, I need the source to make nice little 13 micron dots in the 405 nm range. I've been assured by a pair of vendors that this is an easy matter of purchasing a very expensive laser module, launching it into a fiber, and using a precision fiber-lens assembly to focus it.

All very nice except I'm going bankrupt purchasing the 3 micron positioning equipment, having parts machined, and bringing together the raster scan computer / position control.

So, my question is this:
Can I cheat, purchase a cheap Chinese laser from Ebay, place a 12 micron spatial filter between the laser and target, and focus the beam such that its periphery is restricted by the filter prior to reaching the focal point. Then after reaching the focal point allow it to expand to about 13 microns at the target. Thus, I think I'm imaging the pinhole onto the target.

Does this sound viable or am I getting myself into a world of difficulty?

Thanks in advance,

Mike
 
Science news on Phys.org
I don't follow exactly what you mean to do, but the usual way to focus a laser beam to a small spot is to use a microscope objective designed for an infinite image distance and run it backwards. This is what you would probably use anyway to focus the beam into an optical fiber. If the resulting spot isn't good enough, you put a spatial filter at the focus location, let the beam expand, then focus it again with a second lens. You effectively image the spatial filter onto your target, and the spatial filter cleans up the wings of the far-field pattern by throwing away light, so this presumes you have a bright-enough laser to be able to afford the loss.
 
Thanks Jeff,

This is fairly consistent with what I've been told. Essentially, the method I've been presented with utilizes the nature of a single mode fiber to establish a spatial filtering and then a coated lens is placed a distance from the fiber based upon a focus distance you specify. I've heard it referred to as a focuser (as opposed to a collimator?)

I'm not overly repulsed by using this apparatus as it's not overly expensive, but the laser + fiber coupling to drive the thing quickly approaches the $2000 range. That seems expensive when I'm only attempting to make a 13 micron dot.

Mike
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top