Precalc absolute value fuction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation |X-16| - |X-2| given that X<7. It is established that for X<7, |X-16| simplifies to 16-X, while |X-2| depends on whether X is greater than or less than 2. For the range 2≤X<7, the expression simplifies to 18-2X, and for X<2, it simplifies to 14. The key points highlight the behavior of absolute values and the conditions under which they change. The solution process emphasizes the importance of identifying critical points in the absolute value functions.
gawman
Detemine |X-16| - |X-2| = ? given X<7
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Boy, it has been ages since I have seen/solved one of these.

I am probably mistaken, but I think this might be the way this is solved:

Detemine |X-16| - |X-2| = ? given X<7

0 < |x-16| - |x-2| < 7
I think at this step, the absolute value symbols disappear.
Then solve for x.

Anyone else, please feel free to correct me. It has been far too long for me to recall if this is the correct path to the solution.
 
Detemine |X-16| - |X-2| = ? given X<7

If X< 7 then X-16< 7-16= -9. Since this X-16 is negative,
|X-16|= -(X-16)= 16-X.
If X< 7, then X-2< 5. "< 5" may be EITHER positive or negative so this is not enough to tell us what |X-2| is. It should be clear that the "break" occurs at X= 2 (just as the "break" in |X-16| occurs at X= 16. If x< 7, then X must be less than 16).

If 2<= X< 7, then |X-16|= -(X-16)= 16- X (because X< 7< 16) and
|X-2|= X- 2 (X-2 is non-negative). |X-16|- |X-2|= 16-X- X+ 2= 18- 2X

If X<= 2, then |X-16|= 16- X as above and |X-2|= -(X-2)= 2-X (X- 2 is now negative). |X- 16|- |X-2|= 16-X-(2-X)= 16-X-2+X= 14.

|X-16|- |X-2|= 18- 2X if 2<= X< 7
= 14 if X< 2
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top